Abstract:The emergence of revised definitions for the high-risk patient with cutaneous malignant melanoma prompts us to re-examine the current status of adjuvant therapy in this disease. We wish to address the question, "once a cutaneous melanoma is surgically removed and the patient is currently free of disease but at high risk for metastases, what can be done to prevent recurrence"?
“…Response rates to radiation therapy have been reported to be 70% with a variety of schedules [1][2][3], However, such responses have been Overshadowed by the development of widespread metastases. In addition, little attention has been given in the past to the role of adjuvant radiation therapy following nodal dissection [4]. Some reports have indicated a trend for radiation therapy to reduce the incidence of local relapse following dissection, although there has been no demonstrated improvement in survival.…”
Radiation therapy has been widely used for palliative management of inoperable metastatic malignant melanoma. For patients with nodal disease, response rates of approximately 70% have been reported. There are limited data concerning the role of adjuvant irradiation following therapeutic lymph node dissection. In this review, 57 patients with isolated resectable and nonresectable nodal disease have been treated with radiation. The overall response rate is 84% for bulky disease. Large fractions are beneficial. The median disease-free survivals were 11 months after adjuvant treatment and 7 months for those with inoperable disease. The median overall survivals were 20 months and 18 months, respectively. Local control in long-term survivors was excellent. Sixty-five percent of patients developed distant metastases. There is a need for additional studies with the use of adjuvant radiation therapy following lymph node dissection.
“…Response rates to radiation therapy have been reported to be 70% with a variety of schedules [1][2][3], However, such responses have been Overshadowed by the development of widespread metastases. In addition, little attention has been given in the past to the role of adjuvant radiation therapy following nodal dissection [4]. Some reports have indicated a trend for radiation therapy to reduce the incidence of local relapse following dissection, although there has been no demonstrated improvement in survival.…”
Radiation therapy has been widely used for palliative management of inoperable metastatic malignant melanoma. For patients with nodal disease, response rates of approximately 70% have been reported. There are limited data concerning the role of adjuvant irradiation following therapeutic lymph node dissection. In this review, 57 patients with isolated resectable and nonresectable nodal disease have been treated with radiation. The overall response rate is 84% for bulky disease. Large fractions are beneficial. The median disease-free survivals were 11 months after adjuvant treatment and 7 months for those with inoperable disease. The median overall survivals were 20 months and 18 months, respectively. Local control in long-term survivors was excellent. Sixty-five percent of patients developed distant metastases. There is a need for additional studies with the use of adjuvant radiation therapy following lymph node dissection.
“… Balch et al, 1979a; Balch et al, 1983; Balch and Milton, 1985; Blois et al, 1983b; Breslow, 1970, 1975; Breslow and Macht, 1978; Cohen, 1977; Day et al, 1981d, 1982c; Drzewiecki and Andersen, 1982; Dvir et al, 1980; Griffiths and Briggs, 1984; Hacene et al, 1983; Heenan, 1985; Heenan and Holman, 1983; Jeffrey et al, 1983; Johnson et al, 1985; Kelly et al, 1985b; Koh et al, 1985; Kuehnl‐Petzoldt et al, 1983a; Lemish et al, 1983; MacKie, 1985; Maize 1983; Martijn et al, 1986; McGovern et al, 1983b; Palangie et al, 1981; Roberts et al, 1981; Roses et al, 1979; Schmoeckel and Braun‐Falco, 1978; Sober et al, 1983a,b; Sober, 1984; Sondergaard, 1985a; Trau et al, 1983; Urist et al, 1984, 1985; van der Esch et al, 1981; Veronesi, 1983; Wanebo et al, 1985. …”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.