2011
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjuvant radiotherapy for completely resected stage 2 thymoma

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The clinical benefit of postoperative mediastinal radiation for completely resected Masaoka stage 2 thymoma remains controversial. Due to its indolent nature and infrequent recurrences, no study has definitively determined the optimal approach. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 175 consecutive patients who underwent thymic resection from January 1990 to July 2008 at the University of Pennsylvania. The primary endpoint was local recurrence, defined as recurrence within the surgical bed, treated b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 To obtain clear resection margins that can be deemed monotherapy-adequate, 1 one might require resection of adjacent critical structures. However, some investigators recommend that postoperative RT (PORT) can be considered for various indications [8][9][10][11][12] and others do not find the use of PORT beneficial. [13][14][15][16][17][18] Where there is R1 or R2 resection PORT is sometimes recommended and with the latter, chemotherapy administration might even be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…7 To obtain clear resection margins that can be deemed monotherapy-adequate, 1 one might require resection of adjacent critical structures. However, some investigators recommend that postoperative RT (PORT) can be considered for various indications [8][9][10][11][12] and others do not find the use of PORT beneficial. [13][14][15][16][17][18] Where there is R1 or R2 resection PORT is sometimes recommended and with the latter, chemotherapy administration might even be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[3,7] EIII-IV olgularda TE sonrası adjuvan RT önerilirken, EII olup TE timomalı olgularda adjuvan tedavi kararı-nın kötü risk faktörleri varlığında verilmesi gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır. [13][14][15][16] Sağkalım açısından invazivlik, rezeksiyon tipi, MG varlığı, ileri yaş, tümör çapı, hücre siklus protein ekspresyonu gibi birçok PF ortaya konmasına rağmen genel olarak Masaoka ve DSÖ sınıflaması en iyi ve geçerli prediktörler olarak kabul edilmekte ve adjuvan tedavi kararının PF'ye göre verilmesi gerektiği bildirilmektedir. [1,3,[17][18][19][20] Masaoka evresine göre beş yıllık GSK EI-III timoma için %85, EIV için %65 bildirilmektedir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…There was no difference in OS with a 5 year-OS of 91%. An updated subset analysis in high-risk stage II patients after complete resection was done by Berman et al in 175 patients treated between years 1990-2008 from University of Pennsylvania [4]. Complete resection was done in 62 patients and 37 had high-risk features treated to a dose of 50.4 Gy.…”
Section: Where?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dose of 45-50. 4 Gy given in 180-200 cGy per fraction over 5-6 weeks duration in a postoperative situation with clear/negative margins, 54 Gy for positive margins, 60-70 Gy for gross residual disease.…”
Section: How?mentioning
confidence: 99%