2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjuvant durvalumab for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, phase II study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mamdani et al 5 reported that for patients with locally advanced esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma with pathologically residual disease after R0 resection following nCRT, there was a clinically meaningful improvement in the 1‐year recurrence‐free survival rate with adjuvant durvalumab when compared with historical data. However, the result of another study reported by Park et al . 6 is different from the Checkmate 577 and Mamdani's.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mamdani et al 5 reported that for patients with locally advanced esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma with pathologically residual disease after R0 resection following nCRT, there was a clinically meaningful improvement in the 1‐year recurrence‐free survival rate with adjuvant durvalumab when compared with historical data. However, the result of another study reported by Park et al . 6 is different from the Checkmate 577 and Mamdani's.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Some reasons may explain the different results of aforementioned studies. First, the Checkmate 577 trial was a global phase III study with a higher level of evidence ( n = 794; ESCC, 21%), whereas Park et al's 6 study was a Korean single‐center phase II study with only 86 patients enrolled. Second, most of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens in Checkmate577 were paclitaxel combined with carboplatin (PC), whereas the regimen of Park et al's 6 study was 5‐FU combined with cisplatin (CF).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings of this trial have now been endorsed by treatment guidelines, which indicate that adjuvant treatment with nivolumab significantly prolongs DFS compared with placebo and has an adequate overall safety profile. However, a clinical study conducted by Park et al in 2022 (European Society for Medical Oncology—ESMO) contrasted with Checkmate577 (NCT02520453) [ 31 ]. This placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, phase II clinical study included 86 ESCC patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, staged T3-4N0M0 or T1-4N1-3M0 according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition, and it evaluated the efficacy of adjuvant durvalumab compared to placebo.…”
Section: Icis For Locally Advanced Resectable Esccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the predictive value of PD-L1 expression in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer is controversial. According to the subgroup analysis of the NCT02520453 study, the three-year OS was longer with durvalumab treatment than with placebo in the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1% group (94% versus 64%), but it was shorter in the PD-L1-negative group (42% vs. 55%) [ 31 ]. Nevertheless, in the CheckMate-577 study, nivolumab treatment showed similar clinical benefits regardless of tumor cell PD-L1 expression, indicating that this biomarker was not predictive of clinical benefit in this trial [ 30 ].…”
Section: Predictors Of Efficacy For Tumor Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%