1972
DOI: 10.3181/00379727-141-36900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjuvant Disease--the Paradox of Prevention and Induction with Complete Freund's Adjuvant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These fractions were much less protective against the het erologous cells (human mixed strains of C, DT, and PN), although the high doses of lysozyme-solubilized product protected the rats completely against both homologous and heterologous challenge. A similar phenome non has been reported in which pretreatment with tubercle bacilli in sa line [9], wax D in saline [24] and tubercle bacilli even in water-in-oil emulsion [6] can suppress the disease. This phenomenon has been consid ered to be analogous to tolerance or antigenic competition as discussed in detail by Gery and Waksman [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These fractions were much less protective against the het erologous cells (human mixed strains of C, DT, and PN), although the high doses of lysozyme-solubilized product protected the rats completely against both homologous and heterologous challenge. A similar phenome non has been reported in which pretreatment with tubercle bacilli in sa line [9], wax D in saline [24] and tubercle bacilli even in water-in-oil emulsion [6] can suppress the disease. This phenomenon has been consid ered to be analogous to tolerance or antigenic competition as discussed in detail by Gery and Waksman [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A substantial body of observations indicates that immunologic phenomena underlie the generation of this experimental disease. These are 1) the invariable latency period of at least 10 days between time of inoculation and onset of disease (12); 2) successful transfer of the disease by lymphoid cells from diseased animals (13); 3) an "immune tolerance-like" phenomenon observed in animals that have been exposed to adjuvant early in life (14,15); 4) the suppression of the disease by heterologous antilymphocytic globulin (16), nonlethal whole body irradiation (17), and immunosuppressive drugs (18,19); 5) the hyperglobulinemia and the massive plasma cell concentration in lymph nodes (20); 6) the inhibition of the development of the disease by the removal of lymph nodes that drain the site of adjuvant inoculation (21); and 7) the fact that disease is produced with greater regularity and severity when smaller amounts of adjuvant are injected directly into 1 or more of the inguinal lymph nodes (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in SNP-pretreated groups, rats that did develop AA were found to have lower clinical as well as radiographical scores compared with rats ofthe FIA-pretreated control groups (Tables 1 and 2). Interestingly, SOP, an A'-acetylated octapeptide lacking the N-terminal threonine of 11,14,17,19,19,21,23 SNP, did not have any protective capacity (experiment 2, Tables 1 and 2), AA incidence and severity in SOP-pretreated rats were not difTerent from FtA-pretreated controls (Tables t and 2), This points to the specificity of the SNP effect in AA, It has been postulated that suppression of autoimmune disease in animals is usually caused by the induction of tolerance to the autoimmune disease-inducing antigen (Higgins & Weiner, 1988;Thomson et al, 1988;Clayton et al, 1989), i,e, the protection against mycobacteria-induced arthritis after pretreatment with whole mycobacteria or the 65-kD HSP, is due to induction of tolerance (Grey & Waksman, 1967;Cozine et al, 1972;van den Broek et al, 1989), This led us to investigate the cellular immune response of the rats to SNP, SOP and M. tuberculosis in vivo and in vitro after 35 days of pretreatment but before induction of AA and also 35 days after induction of AA, Before induction of AA, SNP-pretreated rats showed a DTH to SNP, but not to M. tuberculosis (Table 3), Normal rats and FIA-pretreated rats did not show a DTH to SNP, An in vitro proliferative response of splenic MNC to both SNP and M. tuberculosis is found in SNP-pretreated rats, but not in normal or FtA-pretreated rats (Table 3), Interestingly, no crossreactivities between SOP and SNP or M. tuberculosis were observed (Table 3), This is consistent with the fact that T cell clones A2b and A2c do not recognize the epitope without the N-terminal threonine (van der , Therefore it can be concluded that the threonine at position of 180 ofthe 65-kD mycobacterial HSP is important for immunogenicity of the nonapeptide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%