2021
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09546-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer is Associated with Improved Survival for Patients with Low-Risk Pathology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are no high-level data supporting the use of adjuvant chemotherapy among patients who underwent pancreatectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Several retrospective analyses have yielded conflicting results, particularly in the subgroup that benefited from adjuvant chemotherapy [17,18,[22][23][24][25]. Some studies have suggested that postoperative chemotherapy was significantly associated with improved survival for patients with a lower lymph node burden [22,23], whereas one study reported a survival benefit for patients with lymph node positive disease [24].…”
Section: A C C E P T E D a R T I C L E Korean Cancer Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are no high-level data supporting the use of adjuvant chemotherapy among patients who underwent pancreatectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Several retrospective analyses have yielded conflicting results, particularly in the subgroup that benefited from adjuvant chemotherapy [17,18,[22][23][24][25]. Some studies have suggested that postoperative chemotherapy was significantly associated with improved survival for patients with a lower lymph node burden [22,23], whereas one study reported a survival benefit for patients with lymph node positive disease [24].…”
Section: A C C E P T E D a R T I C L E Korean Cancer Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several retrospective analyses have yielded conflicting results, particularly in the subgroup that benefited from adjuvant chemotherapy [17,18,[22][23][24][25]. Some studies have suggested that postoperative chemotherapy was significantly associated with improved survival for patients with a lower lymph node burden [22,23], whereas one study reported a survival benefit for patients with lymph node positive disease [24]. These early studies, however, included various drugs as neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and a large proportion of patients received only chemoradiation as preoperative treatment [22][23][24].…”
Section: A C C E P T E D a R T I C L E Korean Cancer Associationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, in a retrospective NCDB study that included patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced disease who were treated with neoadjuvant therapy, the addition of adjuvant therapy was associated with a survival benefit only among patients with positive margins after resection [ 25 ]. Among patients with stage I-II disease, another NCDB study found that adjuvant therapy after neoadjuvant therapy was associated with higher overall survival only among patients with low-risk pathologic features (i.e., low lymph node ratio, low-grade histology, and negative margin status) [ 26 ]. Taken together, these studies highlight the potential benefit of adjuvant therapy.…”
Section: Adjuvant Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the setting of N0 disease after NAT, the incremental benefit derived from AT remains to be evaluated. Furthermore, the effects of other high-risk pathologic features such as margin status, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and perineural invasion (PNI) have not yet been evaluated in N0 specimens after NAT . Conceptually, the detection of tumor-specific features, or the lack thereof, in patients with N0 disease after NAT may allow investigators to identify a cohort of patients for whom AT may be indicated or omitted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%