2020
DOI: 10.1111/pce.13756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjustment of photosynthetic activity to drought and fluctuating light in wheat

Abstract: Drought is a major cause of losses in crop yield. Under field conditions, plants exposed to drought are usually also experiencing rapid changes in light intensity. Accordingly, plants need to acclimate to both, drought and light stress. Two crucial mechanisms in plant acclimation to changes in light conditions comprise thylakoid protein phosphorylation and dissipation of light energy as heat by non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). Here, we analyzed the acclimation efficacy of two different wheat varieties, by ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggested that drought stress significantly declined plant growth in terms of fresh and dry biomass in all B. napus cultivars. The decrease in plant biomass due to drought stress was higher in the sensitive cultivar (GY605) than in the tolerant cultivars (ZD622, ZS11), which is in line with previous studies on B. napus , B. rapa , B. campestris , and Triticum aestivum (Cha et al, 2020; Grieco et al, 2020; Khanzada et al, 2020; Shawon et al, 2020). Similarly, several previous studies suggested that, under drought stress, the reduction in plant growth attributes is accompanied with a reduction in plants turgor pressure, cell division, cell wall biosynthesis, and cell expansion (B. Li, Feng, et al, 2020; Pakdel et al, 2020; Zaid et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results suggested that drought stress significantly declined plant growth in terms of fresh and dry biomass in all B. napus cultivars. The decrease in plant biomass due to drought stress was higher in the sensitive cultivar (GY605) than in the tolerant cultivars (ZD622, ZS11), which is in line with previous studies on B. napus , B. rapa , B. campestris , and Triticum aestivum (Cha et al, 2020; Grieco et al, 2020; Khanzada et al, 2020; Shawon et al, 2020). Similarly, several previous studies suggested that, under drought stress, the reduction in plant growth attributes is accompanied with a reduction in plants turgor pressure, cell division, cell wall biosynthesis, and cell expansion (B. Li, Feng, et al, 2020; Pakdel et al, 2020; Zaid et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Water shortage and high temperature work synergistically in field conditions (Chen, Li, et al, 2020). Therefore, the present study was Triticum aestivum (Cha et al, 2020;Grieco et al, 2020;Khanzada et al, 2020;Shawon et al, 2020). Similarly, several previous studies suggested that, under drought stress, the reduction in plant growth attributes is accompanied with a reduction in plants turgor pressure, cell division, cell wall biosynthesis, and cell expansion (B.…”
Section: Tolerant Cultivars Showed Enhanced Activities Of Antioxidative Enzymesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…g tot is the total conductance of CO 2 between the leaf surface and sites of RuBP carboxylation (calculated as 1/g tot = 1/g s + 1/g m ). The chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were calculated as follows: to Y(II) (Grieco et al 2020).…”
Section: Quantitative Limitation Analysis Of a Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have examined the effect of drought stress on photosynthesis under stable light intensity (Oukarroum, Schansker & Strasser 2009;Galmés et al 2013;Zivcak et al 2013). However, drought stress is rarely studied under FL conditions (Grieco et al 2020;Qu et al 2020). Under FL, plants may exhibit different photosynthetic performance when also experiencing drought stress compared with sufficient water conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once PSI is damaged, the CO 2 assimilation rate significantly decreases, impairing plant growth [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. Fortunately, plants have evolved several effective mechanisms to protect PSI against photo-oxidative damage under FL [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. In angiosperms, two alternative electron flows, cyclic electron flow (CEF) around PSI and water–water cycle (WWC), have the potential to fine-tune the redox state of PSI under FL [ 6 , 18 , 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%