2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-019-01480-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjustment of CT-fractional flow reserve based on fluid–structure interaction underestimation to minimize 1-year cardiac events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the specificity of CT-FFR has previously been reported to be lower than the sensitivity using invasive FFR as a reference [12,13], unnecessary revascularization may result in an increase in false positive cases only, based on the results of CT-FFR. To overcome this problem, we reported the influence of pre-test probability on diagnostic performance as well as improvements in diagnostic performance using the correction formula for CT-FFR [24], and we also demonstrated that the strongest factor associated with false positivity was the presence of calcification [15]. Thus, we hypothesized that false positivity may be reduced by analyzing CT-FFR in images from which coronary arterial calcification had been removed using the subtraction method, particularly in cases with severe calcification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the specificity of CT-FFR has previously been reported to be lower than the sensitivity using invasive FFR as a reference [12,13], unnecessary revascularization may result in an increase in false positive cases only, based on the results of CT-FFR. To overcome this problem, we reported the influence of pre-test probability on diagnostic performance as well as improvements in diagnostic performance using the correction formula for CT-FFR [24], and we also demonstrated that the strongest factor associated with false positivity was the presence of calcification [15]. Thus, we hypothesized that false positivity may be reduced by analyzing CT-FFR in images from which coronary arterial calcification had been removed using the subtraction method, particularly in cases with severe calcification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT-FFR was calculated for the original and the subtracted data. CT-FFR was calculated using a previously reported method [ 11 , 12 , 15 , 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%