1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf02729528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjustment for bias in discriminant analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, through a careful examination of a number of theoretical studies laying the groundwork for DA, the author identified criteria that could be used to evaluate methodological rigor in the application of this technique. The early conceptual studies on DA consulted for this review, comprised Crask and Perreault (1977), Hallaq (1975), Huberty (1984), Klecka (1980), Lachenbruch (1975), Lachenbruch and Mickey (1968), Morrison (1969), and Press and Wilson (1978). An initial list of 20 criteria was developed before being refined by two experts on multivariate analysis, and in line with best practice guidelines recommended in the frequently cited handbooks (e.g.…”
Section: Search Criteria and Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…First, through a careful examination of a number of theoretical studies laying the groundwork for DA, the author identified criteria that could be used to evaluate methodological rigor in the application of this technique. The early conceptual studies on DA consulted for this review, comprised Crask and Perreault (1977), Hallaq (1975), Huberty (1984), Klecka (1980), Lachenbruch (1975), Lachenbruch and Mickey (1968), Morrison (1969), and Press and Wilson (1978). An initial list of 20 criteria was developed before being refined by two experts on multivariate analysis, and in line with best practice guidelines recommended in the frequently cited handbooks (e.g.…”
Section: Search Criteria and Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to reiterate that in total, 68 models (representing exactly two-thirds of the models appraised) use direct testing. The use of direct testing in DA culminates in an overfitting model, which pivots results toward the alternate hypothesis while creating upwardly biased classification scores in the predictive component of the model (Hallaq, 1975;Lachenbruch, 1975). To elaborate on the adoption of the testing approach, this review revisits the sample and group size requirements pertinent to DA.…”
Section: Construct Models To Match Properties Of Data and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the predictors), and therefore degrees of freedom, increases [337] . In the process the contributions of the noise to the fitted relationship increases, and the ability to produce accurate future predictions diminished [337] .…”
Section: Equation 38mentioning
confidence: 99%