1968
DOI: 10.2307/2974406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjustment Costs in the Theory of Investment of the Firm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
162
0
16

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 442 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
162
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…It has already been signaled that the efficiency of such myopic investment decisions critically depends on investment prices being exogenous: under endogenous investment costs, optimal investment decisions require to perfectly anticipate all future prices (Gould, 1968;Mussa, 1977). The bad performance of imperfectly computed LCOEs is thus not surprising (and is not a theoretical challenge under the rational expectation hypothesis).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has already been signaled that the efficiency of such myopic investment decisions critically depends on investment prices being exogenous: under endogenous investment costs, optimal investment decisions require to perfectly anticipate all future prices (Gould, 1968;Mussa, 1977). The bad performance of imperfectly computed LCOEs is thus not surprising (and is not a theoretical challenge under the rational expectation hypothesis).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les modèles stochastiques d'investissement avec coûts d'ajustement furent introduits par Gould (1968), Lucas (1967), et Hartman (1972, et raffinés par Abel (1983) et Pindyck (1982. Château (1985Château ( et 1989 utilise une spécification microfinancière équivalente.…”
Section: S T )-M T CD T -S T D T -C(s T )]\unclassified
“…Instead, they would find it optimal to adjust slowly and distribute the adjustment costs over time. This notion has been later expanded by Lucas (1967), Gould (1968), Treadway (1969) and others. 85 Tobin (1969) defined q to be the ratio of the market value of a firm to the capital replacement cost of the firm.…”
Section: Modelling Capital and Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%