2009
DOI: 10.1159/000226227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjusting Flow-Mediated Dilation for Shear Stress Stimulus Allows Demonstration of Endothelial Dysfunction in a Population with Moderate Cardiovascular Risk

Abstract: Background/Aims: Although normalization of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) to individual shear stress (FMD:shear stress ratio) has been proposed to improve this measure of endothelial function, the clinical utility of FMD normalization has not yet been demonstrated. We tested (1) whether following conventional 5-min forearm occlusion, the FMD:shear stress ratio would discriminate a population with moderate cardiovascular risk (MR) from a low-risk (LR) population, and (2) whether the dose-response … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
68
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
68
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous findings using graded levels of shear stress (22,29,37,43). The slope of the SR-%FMD relationship was significantly steeper in the RA whether the stimulus was expressed as the absolute SR or the increase in SR from baseline (deltaSR).…”
Section: Between-artery Differences: Stimulus-response Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is consistent with previous findings using graded levels of shear stress (22,29,37,43). The slope of the SR-%FMD relationship was significantly steeper in the RA whether the stimulus was expressed as the absolute SR or the increase in SR from baseline (deltaSR).…”
Section: Between-artery Differences: Stimulus-response Relationshipsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A recent observation by Padilla et al (27) supports our findings. Internal data from their laboratory showed that continuous assessment of diameter at 5 frames/s yields the same FMD results as R-wave-gated images (n ϭ 10, FMD ϭ 7.58 Ϯ 0.9 vs. 7.62 Ϯ 0.9%, P ϭ 0.655, intraclass correlation ϭ 0.998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Due to the variability in SR after ischaemia among subjects, we also calculated FMD to shear rate ratio (FMD:SR AUC ) in order to normalise the FMD for the stimulus. 13,14 To measure the reproducibility and precision of the method we have studied 15 subjects twice (data not published). Within method reproducibility, expressed as the percentage of the coefficient of variation [(SD of the paired differences/the overall mean)√2] × 100, was 5.4% for brachial artery diameter, 7.4% for FMD and 24.8% for mean blood velocity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%