2008
DOI: 10.1080/02664760802319709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjusting economic estimates in business surveys

Abstract: Statistics for small areas within larger regions are recently required for many economic variables. However, when adding the estimates of the small areas within the larger regions, the results do not match up to those obtained with the appropriate estimator originally derived for the larger region. To avoid discrepancies between estimates benchmarking methods are commonly used in practice. In this paper, we discuss the suitability of using a restricted predictor versus a traditional direct calibrated estimator… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Ugarte et al . (, ) used bootstrapping to estimate the MSE of benchmarked estimators, derived from linear mixed models with restrictions. González‐Manteiga et al .…”
Section: Mean‐squared Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Ugarte et al . (, ) used bootstrapping to estimate the MSE of benchmarked estimators, derived from linear mixed models with restrictions. González‐Manteiga et al .…”
Section: Mean‐squared Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, bootstrap methods are an attractive alternative that is already used in small area estimation. For example, Ugarte et al (2008Ugarte et al ( , 2009a used bootstrapping to estimate the MSE of benchmarked estimators, derived from linear mixed models with restrictions. González-Manteiga et al (2007) proposed bootstrap methods to estimate the MSE of a small area estimator derived from a logistic mixed model, and Molina et al (2007) adapted the bootstrap to a multinomial mixed model.…”
Section: Mean-squared Errormentioning
confidence: 99%