Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11239-018-1771-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjusted versus actual body weight dosing of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in obese patients with warfarin-associated major bleeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondary end points observed in this analysis are consistent with previous trials and provide additional support for the safety of aPCC. Incidence of thrombotic events in this study was lower than in the previous analysis by Htet et al 22 (1% vs 5%) but similar to the rates observed by Smetana et al 5 (1% vs 2%). Neither of the aforementioned analyses reported time to initiation of VTE prophylaxis, and it is likely that institutional protocols regarding type and timing of VTE prophylaxis are widely variable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Secondary end points observed in this analysis are consistent with previous trials and provide additional support for the safety of aPCC. Incidence of thrombotic events in this study was lower than in the previous analysis by Htet et al 22 (1% vs 5%) but similar to the rates observed by Smetana et al 5 (1% vs 2%). Neither of the aforementioned analyses reported time to initiation of VTE prophylaxis, and it is likely that institutional protocols regarding type and timing of VTE prophylaxis are widely variable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…4 This leaves a gap in the literature as to how PCC should be dosed in obese patients and if alternative dosing methods (ie, adjusted body weight) might be effective. A recent study published by Smetana et al 5 evaluated the use of nonactivated, 4-factor PCC in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] > 30 kg/m 2 ) and compared dosing on actual body weight with a 100-kg cap to adjusted body weight. 5 The investigators concluded that achievement of goal INR was significantly lower in the adjusted body weight group compared with the actual body weight group (36% vs 68%; P = 0.006), suggesting that using an adjusted body weight is less effective; however, this study did not evaluate bleeding outcomes, so it is difficult to extrapolate whether these findings were clinically significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Achievement of the target INR was lower in the adjusted weight group versus actual weight group (36% vs 68%; p = 0.006), with no differences in mortality or hospital stay, indicating 4F-PCC should be dosed according to the manufacturer’s guidelines in obese patients until further data are available. 44…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observational cohort studies appear to be the most achievable and interesting study design to pharmacists . Consequently, pharmacist‐led practice and education‐based research networks have been established and leveraged to conduct research in multiple pharmacy specialties, representing a way for pharmacists to become more involved in conducting multicenter research . The advantages of these networks are numerous and include bringing together practitioners and researchers to collaborate on practice‐related projects, facilitating collaborations that may be maintained beyond a single project, and enhancing the sample size and generalizability of findings .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%