2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjusted F-measure and kernel scaling for imbalanced data learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 lists the detection results. Table 2 lists the evaluation measures that are calculated by (12)- (15).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 lists the detection results. Table 2 lists the evaluation measures that are calculated by (12)- (15).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, since the common evaluation measures (for example, false negative rate, false positive rate, and accuracy rate) are not applicable for evaluating the performance of anomaly detection algorithms on imbalanced datasets, some measures including F 1 -measure [15], GMean [11], [18] are introduced in the literature.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this an approximated hyperplane of the SVM was obtained and a kernel function was applied by computing the parameters through the chi-square test. Maratea et al improved the association capability of SVM by surpassing the approximate solution through kernel transformation [20]. The asymmetric space around the class boundary was enlarged that compensates the data skewness in binary classification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. Maratea et al (2014) defined Accuracy as "the probability of success in recognizing the right class of an instance. "…”
Section: Evaluation Phasementioning
confidence: 99%