2022
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012131.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjunctive steroid therapy versus antibiotics alone for acute endophthalmitis after intraocular procedure

Abstract: Adjunctive steroid therapy versus antibiotics alone for acute endophthalmitis a er intraocular procedure (Review)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is important in evaluating possible benefits to be drawn from similar studies for fungal endophthalmitis and represents necessary steps to drawing conclusions and establishing the mainstays of treatment. In 2022, a review of four randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of adjunctive steroids versus antibiotics alone in managing acute bacterial endophthalmitis suggested a possible improvement in visual outcomes at 3 months when using adjunctive steroids, although this result was not statistically significant [41]. Their conclusion also contained suggestions for future studies which might be applied broadly and utilized in any future studies which might investigate adjuvant steroids in fungal endophthalmitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is important in evaluating possible benefits to be drawn from similar studies for fungal endophthalmitis and represents necessary steps to drawing conclusions and establishing the mainstays of treatment. In 2022, a review of four randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of adjunctive steroids versus antibiotics alone in managing acute bacterial endophthalmitis suggested a possible improvement in visual outcomes at 3 months when using adjunctive steroids, although this result was not statistically significant [41]. Their conclusion also contained suggestions for future studies which might be applied broadly and utilized in any future studies which might investigate adjuvant steroids in fungal endophthalmitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their conclusion also contained suggestions for future studies which might be applied broadly and utilized in any future studies which might investigate adjuvant steroids in fungal endophthalmitis. These suggestions included examining specific clinical settings, focusing and stratifying based on causative organism or etiology, and also including outcomes based on patient symptomology and establishing uniform outcomes that are consistent between studies short-and long-term intervals [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the role of steroids as adjuvant therapy for AE remains controversial, our current study does not attempt to address this. [23][24][25] Finally, as the low incidence of AE after IVI therapy meant that our small sample size depended heavily on external patient referrals, this could have been a significant source of bias. It is likely that these patients were referred to our practice for advanced management because they presented with more advanced/serious disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study in the Cochrane Library states that the currently available evidence on the effectiveness of adjunctive steroid therapy versus antibiotics alone in managing acute endophthalmitis after intraocular surgery is inadequate [ 153 ]. A combined analysis of a very limited number of studies suggests that adjunctive steroids might provide a higher chance of having a better visual outcome at three months [ 153 ]. Moreover, another study shows a higher rate of enucleation/evisceration in patients who did not receive steroid therapy [ 147 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%