Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjunctive high-frequency right prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was not effective in obsessive–compulsive disorder but improved secondary depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
64
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be noted that in the setting of refractory OCD, previously reported effects of sham rTMS are relatively minimal, ranging from 1% tõ 20% improvement in YBOCS scores; indeed, even active stimulation of lateral targets such as dlPFC has consistently achieved less than 25% YBOCS improvement across several independent studies (Alonso et al, 2001;Sachdev et al, 2007;Mantovani et al, 2010a;Sarkhel et al, 2010). Thus, it is unlikely that placebo effects can fully account for the present observations of a~40% overall improvement in the present study, a bimodal outcome distribution, distinct patterns of functional connectivity through the dmPFC-ventral striatal target circuit in responders vs nonresponders (who were not otherwise distinct on clinical measures), distinct patterns of change in this circuit in responders and nonresponders, and the concordance of these results with the previous findings of an independent study using DBS rather than rTMS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it should be noted that in the setting of refractory OCD, previously reported effects of sham rTMS are relatively minimal, ranging from 1% tõ 20% improvement in YBOCS scores; indeed, even active stimulation of lateral targets such as dlPFC has consistently achieved less than 25% YBOCS improvement across several independent studies (Alonso et al, 2001;Sachdev et al, 2007;Mantovani et al, 2010a;Sarkhel et al, 2010). Thus, it is unlikely that placebo effects can fully account for the present observations of a~40% overall improvement in the present study, a bimodal outcome distribution, distinct patterns of functional connectivity through the dmPFC-ventral striatal target circuit in responders vs nonresponders (who were not otherwise distinct on clinical measures), distinct patterns of change in this circuit in responders and nonresponders, and the concordance of these results with the previous findings of an independent study using DBS rather than rTMS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Previous studies of rTMS in OCD have encountered little therapeutic benefit with stimulation of lateral prefrontal targets such as the dlPFC (Alonso et al, 2001;Prasko et al, 2006;Sachdev et al, 2007;Sarkhel et al, 2010), but somewhat more success with medial prefrontal targets such as the SMA or pre-SMA (Mantovani et al, 2006(Mantovani et al, , 2010aKumar and Chadda, 2011). The results of the present study are congruent with this latter literature in suggesting that rTMS of a slightly more anterior medial prefrontal target, the dmPFC, can also yield substantial symptom reduction in a proportion of OCD cases, even when multiple previous medication trials have failed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repetitive TMS (rTMS) to the DLPFC has generally failed to demonstrate superiority over sham. Despite initial reports from open studies [121], multiple sham-controlled studies of rTMS to the DLPFC at 1 or 10 Hz, 110% motor threshold (MT), found no benefit of active treatment over placebo [122][123][124]. This lack of benefit was replicated in a group of 30 patients receiving active or sham rTMS of the right DLPFC [125].…”
Section: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Sarkhel et al reported that high-frequency rTMS as an adjunctive treatment over right prefrontal cortex was not effective in OCD, while it significantly improved the comorbid secondary depression. [70] Reviewing the findings of randomized clinical trials as well as the previous conducted meta analyses, the main findings on the efficacies of rTMS for OCD treatment are as follow: Low frequencies rTMS are more efficient than high frequencies. The sites of stimulation including orbitofrontal cortex and the supplementary motor area are more likely to respond to the treatment compared with the DLPFC or temporal or temporoparietal cortices.…”
Section: Ocdmentioning
confidence: 99%