2020
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjunctive effect of systemic antimicrobials in periodontitis therapy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Periodontitis is an infectious inflammatory disease triggered and aggravated by the dysbiosis of the subgingival microbiota. Periodontal treatments should promote significant clinical improvements and prevent further disease progression. There is compelling evidence that these clinical outcomes are achieved when the proportions of periodontal pathogens are reduced by treatment and the root surfaces are recolonized with a new microbial community harbouring higher proportions of host-compatible species (Haffajee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
184
1
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
10
184
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This antibiotic has shown significant reductions in a global inflammatory score comprised by hs-CRP, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α, at 6 months, but not on CRP alone [51], and hence, the cardiovascular effect shown in this study could be attributed to the antibiotic rather than the periodontal therapy. However, the adjunctive use of systemic antimicrobials to subgingival instrumentation is clearly justified by the periodontitis severity in the selected sample, since this modality of therapy has demonstrated a significant added effect on clinical and microbiological outcomes when compared to subgingival debridement alone in severe periodontitis patients [52], as well as in randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of intensive periodontal therapy in cardiovascular risk outcomes [40,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This antibiotic has shown significant reductions in a global inflammatory score comprised by hs-CRP, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α, at 6 months, but not on CRP alone [51], and hence, the cardiovascular effect shown in this study could be attributed to the antibiotic rather than the periodontal therapy. However, the adjunctive use of systemic antimicrobials to subgingival instrumentation is clearly justified by the periodontitis severity in the selected sample, since this modality of therapy has demonstrated a significant added effect on clinical and microbiological outcomes when compared to subgingival debridement alone in severe periodontitis patients [52], as well as in randomized clinical trials evaluating the impact of intensive periodontal therapy in cardiovascular risk outcomes [40,46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes or delta (∆) in clinical parameters (at subject level) from baseline to 3, 6, 9 and 12 months were determined. "Pocket" closure was de ned as mean and SD of percentage of sites going from PPD ≥ 4 mm to PPD ≤ 3 mm at 3-and 12-months follow up [7]. "Risk for disease progression" was de ned at the patient level according to Land and Tonetti (2003).…”
Section: Outcome Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systemic antibiotics have the advantage of reaching all oral surfaces and uids, in addition to having the potential to reach periodontal pathogens that eventually invade the host's tissue [7]. Azithromycin is a broad-spectrum bacteriostatic antibiotic [8] with immunomodulatory properties [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to its pharmacological properties azithromycin allows a once a day administration over 3 or 5 days, thus increasing patient compliance [8] and limiting the side effects. Azithromycin as an adjunct to SRP signi cantly improves the e cacy of non-surgical periodontal therapy in terms of probing pocket depth (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BOP) reduction along with clinical attachment level gain [5,7]. SRP in conjunction with antibiotics is nevertheless not always associated with superior clinical results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%