2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.humic.2020.100077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjunctive dental therapies in caries-active children: Shifting the cariogenic salivary microbiome from dysbiosis towards non-cariogenic health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilizing AI algorithms with salivary biomarkers to generate models that can be validated and applied potentially in clinical practice is more common than its use for biomarker discovery (Arias-Bujanda et al, 2020;Banavar et al, 2021;Bostanci et al, 2018;Carnielli et al, 2018;da Costa et al, 2022;de Dumast et al, 2018;Eriksson et al, 2022;Gomez Hernandez et al, 2021;Grier et al, 2021;Kim et al, 2021;Kistenev et al, 2018;Koller et al, 2021;Koopaie et al, 2021;Kouznetsova et al, 2021;Lee et al, 2021;Liu, Tong, et al, 2021;Lyashenko et al, 2020;Monedeiro et al, 2021;Nakano et al, 2014Nakano et al, , 2018Pang et al, 2021;Schulte et al, 2020;Shoukri et al, 2019;Song et al, 2020;Sonis et al, 2013;Tamaki et al, 2009;Winck et al, 2015;Wu et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021;Zhou et al, 2021;Zlotogorski-Hurvitz et al, 2019) AI-based biomarker platforms constructed during biomarker discovery may be executed for biomarker validation on the premise that each additional saliva sample would be subjected to similar large-scale analysis and used as input for the same models (Adeoye, Wan, et al, 2022). While this may not be cost-effective, feasible, or encourage validation, promising biomarkers selected using conventional statistical approaches or AI-based exploratory analysis (in biomarker discovery) may be used to develop new models for biomarker validation and potential clinical application (Koopaie et al, 2021;Tamaki et al, 2009).…”
Section: Ai Models In Salivary Biomarker Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Utilizing AI algorithms with salivary biomarkers to generate models that can be validated and applied potentially in clinical practice is more common than its use for biomarker discovery (Arias-Bujanda et al, 2020;Banavar et al, 2021;Bostanci et al, 2018;Carnielli et al, 2018;da Costa et al, 2022;de Dumast et al, 2018;Eriksson et al, 2022;Gomez Hernandez et al, 2021;Grier et al, 2021;Kim et al, 2021;Kistenev et al, 2018;Koller et al, 2021;Koopaie et al, 2021;Kouznetsova et al, 2021;Lee et al, 2021;Liu, Tong, et al, 2021;Lyashenko et al, 2020;Monedeiro et al, 2021;Nakano et al, 2014Nakano et al, , 2018Pang et al, 2021;Schulte et al, 2020;Shoukri et al, 2019;Song et al, 2020;Sonis et al, 2013;Tamaki et al, 2009;Winck et al, 2015;Wu et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021;Zhou et al, 2021;Zlotogorski-Hurvitz et al, 2019) AI-based biomarker platforms constructed during biomarker discovery may be executed for biomarker validation on the premise that each additional saliva sample would be subjected to similar large-scale analysis and used as input for the same models (Adeoye, Wan, et al, 2022). While this may not be cost-effective, feasible, or encourage validation, promising biomarkers selected using conventional statistical approaches or AI-based exploratory analysis (in biomarker discovery) may be used to develop new models for biomarker validation and potential clinical application (Koopaie et al, 2021;Tamaki et al, 2009).…”
Section: Ai Models In Salivary Biomarker Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, their AUCs were from 0.71 to 0.93 (Table 2). However, similar to the use of intelligent models for oral cancer, many studies had insufficient sample sizes to meet a minimum event‐per‐variable cutoff of twenty considering the number of predictive salivary biomarkers available for model construction (Grier et al, 2021; Koller et al, 2021; Koopaie et al, 2021; Lyashenko et al, 2020; Wu et al, 2021). These models will also benefit from retraining using larger sample sizes and external validation in the future.…”
Section: Current Applications Of Artificial Intelligence For Salivary...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…class label). Among the conventional ML methods, logistic regression (LR), RF ( Man et al, 2019 ), and support vector machine (SVM) ( Lyashenko et al, 2020 ) are the most frequently used supervised learning algorithms. Although ML algorithms such as RFs can handle a large number of features, their accuracy can still be limited in complex datasets ( Statnikov et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Overview Of Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%