2016
DOI: 10.1176/appi.focus.140202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjunctive Atypical Antipsychotic Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Depression, Quality of Life, and Safety Outcomes

Abstract: Background: Atypical antipsychotic medications are widely prescribed for the adjunctive treatment of depression, yet their total risk-benefit profile is not well understood. We thus conducted a systematic review of the efficacy and safety profiles of atypical antipsychotic medications used for the adjunctive treatment of depression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
81
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
81
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] This increase has been driven primarily by prescriber preference for atypical (or second-generation) antipsychotics, 1,2 higher costs of newer agents compared with typical (or first-generation) antipsychotics 1 and a widening range of on-and off-label uses. [3][4][5][7][8][9] The increase in the use of atypical antipsychotic medications has been particularly marked in older adults with dementia. 8,[10][11][12] Since the early 2000s, there has been a growing appreciation for antipsychotic-related adverse effects among older people with dementia, which prompted warnings from the manufacturers and Health Canada regarding the safety of risperidone and olanzapine in 2002 and 2004, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] This increase has been driven primarily by prescriber preference for atypical (or second-generation) antipsychotics, 1,2 higher costs of newer agents compared with typical (or first-generation) antipsychotics 1 and a widening range of on-and off-label uses. [3][4][5][7][8][9] The increase in the use of atypical antipsychotic medications has been particularly marked in older adults with dementia. 8,[10][11][12] Since the early 2000s, there has been a growing appreciation for antipsychotic-related adverse effects among older people with dementia, which prompted warnings from the manufacturers and Health Canada regarding the safety of risperidone and olanzapine in 2002 and 2004, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, sPielmans, et al 2013, found that treatment was linked to several adverse events, including akathisia (aripiprazole), sedation (quetiapine, olanzapine/fluoxetine combination (OFC), and aripiprazole), abnormal metabolic laboratory results (quetiapine and OFC), and weight gain (all four drugs, especially OFC). (sPielmans et al, 2013) So, it is relevant to attempt to thoroughly understand the risk-benefit profiles of these adjunctive treatments for major depressive disorder taking into account the lack of benefit with regards to quality of life or functional impairment, and the abundant evidence of potential treatment-related harm (sPielmans et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, akathisia and Adverse Effects of Second-Generation Antipsychotics restlessness are the most common problematic adverse effects associated with adjunctive therapy with aripiprazole and brexpiprazole; sedation is the most common problematic adverse effect associated with adjunctive quetiapine therapy, and increased appetite and weight gain are the most problematic adverse effects associated with adjunctive therapy with olanzapine. [17][18][19] If NNH values are computed on the incidence of adverse effects, rather than attrition due to intolerable adverse effects, a much harsher view of tolerability is revealed. 13,16 For example, because about onehalf of patients treated with quetiapine will report some degree of sedation or daytime sleepiness during the first week of therapy (compared with <10% on placebo), an NNH value of 3 can be estimated.…”
Section: Akathisiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 Clinicians can take some comfort in the fact that weight can be measured so accurately and inexpensively. Spielmans and colleagues 17 included weight change in their systematic review and meta-analysis.…”
Section: Weight Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%