2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40062-013-0073-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjunction between crossed modules of groups and algebras

Abstract: We construct a pair of adjoint functors between the categories of crossed modules of groups and associative algebras and establish an equivalence of categories between module structures over a crossed module of groups and its respective crossed module of associative algebras.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(19 reference statements)
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of crossed modules, these internal actions agree with the concept of an action studied by Norrie [33] and Forrester-Barker [20]. Here we recall the presentation given in [11]. An action of a crossed module pH, G, µq on another crossed module pM, P, νq is completely determined by an action of G (and so H) on M and P together with a map ξ : HˆP Ñ M such that the conditions…”
Section: Crossed Modules Their Nerves and Their Actionssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In the case of crossed modules, these internal actions agree with the concept of an action studied by Norrie [33] and Forrester-Barker [20]. Here we recall the presentation given in [11]. An action of a crossed module pH, G, µq on another crossed module pM, P, νq is completely determined by an action of G (and so H) on M and P together with a map ξ : HˆP Ñ M such that the conditions…”
Section: Crossed Modules Their Nerves and Their Actionssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Actions of crossed modules of different structures have also been described in terms of equations, as it can be checked in [10] for crossed modules of groups, in [8], [11] or [31] for crossed modules of Lie algebras, and in [7] for crossed modules of Leibniz algebras. Bearing those examples in mind, it is seemingly reasonable to address the problem by following the next steps: firstly, we consider a homomorphism from (M, P, η) to Act(L, D, µ) = (Tetra(D, L), Tetra(L, D, µ), ∆), and translate into equations every property satisfied by that homomorphism.…”
Section: The Actormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10], it is given an extension to crossed modules of the adjunction between the unit group functor and the group algebra functor. Additionally, the 2-dimensional generalizations of the corresponding adjunctions for Lie vs Alg and Lb vs Dias are presented in [9,13], where the resulting commutative squares of categories and functors are assembled into four parallelepipeds containing the original adjunctions and their natural generalizations:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a working definition, completely bypassing its (unknown, and possibly not-existing) relation with simplicial algebras with Moore complex of length one. We note that crossed modules of associative algebras are defined in [Arv04,CIKL14,DIKL12], and our definition is more restrictive. Notice that, in the case of commutative algebras (where left and right actions are the same thing) our definition of crossed modules coincides with the one in [AP96].…”
Section: Crossed Modules Of Bare Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%