2018 Wind Energy Symposium 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-1241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjoint-Based High-Fidelity Aeroelastic Optimization of Wind Turbine Blade for Load Stress Minimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously mentioned, structural considerations are crucial in wind turbine design. Anderson et al (2018) partially addressed this issue by coupling the NSU3D RANS solver with the AStrO structural finite element solver through a fluid-structure interface to converge on realistic, steadystate loads on the SWiFT RWT. They used Abaqus to make a finite element model with shell elements.…”
Section: High-fidelity Cfd-based Optimization Using the Adjoint Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As previously mentioned, structural considerations are crucial in wind turbine design. Anderson et al (2018) partially addressed this issue by coupling the NSU3D RANS solver with the AStrO structural finite element solver through a fluid-structure interface to converge on realistic, steadystate loads on the SWiFT RWT. They used Abaqus to make a finite element model with shell elements.…”
Section: High-fidelity Cfd-based Optimization Using the Adjoint Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simply upscaling the turbine leads to an increase in swept area, which in turn extracts more energy. However, a naive upscaling does not capture the complexity of the problem (Ashuri, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, at the end of this short literature overview we allow a side note to briefly mention the recent work by Anderson et al (2018) who couple the high-fidelity NSU3D flow solver and the high-fidelity AStrO structural finite element solver through (Nadarajah, 2003) there are evidently two parameterization options: i) mesh points (seemingly the preferred approach by Nadarajah) and ii) Hicks-Henne functions. Since the latter do not require gradient smoothing and since Ritlop and Nadarajah do indeed smooth gradients we assume that they use the actual surface mesh points as design variables.…”
Section: High-fidelity Optimization Using the Adjoint Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%