1993
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4049(93)90051-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjacent integrally closed ideals in dimension two

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note however that our result says more; and besides being valid in arbitrary two-dimensional regular local rings, it also shows that q β is actually the smallest complete ideal strictly containing ℘ β . (This has been proved previously by Noh [12,Thm. 3.1], at least when the residue field of α is algebraically closed.)…”
Section: Proposition (45)supporting
confidence: 63%
“…Note however that our result says more; and besides being valid in arbitrary two-dimensional regular local rings, it also shows that q β is actually the smallest complete ideal strictly containing ℘ β . (This has been proved previously by Noh [12,Thm. 3.1], at least when the residue field of α is algebraically closed.)…”
Section: Proposition (45)supporting
confidence: 63%
“…If P is a simple complete ideal, by [10] any power of P other than P has infinitely many adjacent over-ideals. There also exist at least n adjacent over-ideals of J = J 1 · · · J n if n > 1 and J i is not a w j -ideal for j = i, where R(J ) = {w j | j = 1, .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was proved that the v-predecessor P v is the unique complete adjacent over-ideal of P (cf. [6][7][8], [9,Appendix], [10]). It was further shown that either P v is simple, in which case it equals P t−1 , or it is a product of two simple complete ideals P t−1 P i for some 0 i < t − 1 using proximity relations among prime divisors v j associated to the simple v-ideals P j for 0 j t. However, the v-successor I +1 of P is not adjacent to P from below as it was shown that λ A (I /I +1 ) = 2 [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If α = α , then ν x − α y k+1 = 2k + 2 since P k+1 is also a ν-ideal and P k = x, y k+1 ⊃ x − α y k+1 , y k+2 are adjacent but x − α y k+1 , y k+2 is not a ν-ideal [9,Lemma 3.3]. Then,…”
Section: B = Even Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If S is proximate to T and P ⊃ Q are the simple integrally closed ideals associated to the m(T )-adic and m(S)-adic order valuations respectively, then we also say that Q is proximate to P . In the sequence (1.1), the v-predecessor I n−1 of I is the unique integrally closed ideal adjacent to I from above [6,Theorem 4.11], [9,Theorem 3.1]. Furthermore, I n−1 is the product of simple v-ideals P i s associated to R i s to which R t is proximate, and that there are at most two such R i s to which R t is proximate [6,Theorem 4.11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%