2009
DOI: 10.1177/097317410900400103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adivasi Mobilisation

Abstract: In August 2001 there was widespread protest in Kerala, a state otherwise known for its remarkable achievements in 'human' development, at the starvation deaths that had occurred in a number of adivasi colonies. This prompted a continuing debate on the meaning of the Kerala 'model' of development for adivasis, in which a consensus seems to have risen that adivasis are the victims of Kerala's development experience and in which their current mobilisation is seen as the fi rst time in history that their interests… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Adivasis are socially excluded and the mainstream society considers the social standing of the Adivasis at the lowest strata along with the Dalits (Steur, 2009). They are stereotyped as primitive and uncivilized.…”
Section: The Stigma Of Being An Adivasimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Adivasis are socially excluded and the mainstream society considers the social standing of the Adivasis at the lowest strata along with the Dalits (Steur, 2009). They are stereotyped as primitive and uncivilized.…”
Section: The Stigma Of Being An Adivasimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This struggle was crushed by the state police. These agitations have been argued as having made the ‘Adivasi’ a strong political identity in Kerala (Steur, 2009, 2017). The resistance was a flashpoint that sent a clear message of defiance to the authorities and the upper castes.…”
Section: Resistance and Counter‐resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ST respondents in Wayanad identified and discussed their forced removal from the forest several decades ago as a serious negative event (K. Kumar, Singh, & Kerr, 2015). While only the GEN1 participant remembered this event clearly, the level of trauma this experience created in these individuals, households and communities was very high (Steur, 2009).…”
Section: Negative Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%