2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352013000600002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aditivos alimentares na dieta de bovinos confinados

Abstract: RESUMOO objetivo do presente trabalho foi avaliar o efeito da inclusão do preparado de anticorpos policlonais (PAP) e/ou da monensina sódica (MON) sobre o desempenho, as características da carcaça, o perfil de ácidos graxos da carcaça (PAG) e a concentração de lipoproteínas sanguíneas (CLS) de bovinos confinados. O delineamento experimental foi inteiramente ao acaso, em arranjo fatorial 2 x 2, com medidas repetidas no tempo, sendo os fatores a inclusão ou não de MON e PAP avaliados em dois períodos, em que 72 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, G:F was improved in yearling bulls fed 9 ppm of MON, which is a consequence of the greater ADG just described. Likewise, Barducci et al (2013) fed 30 ppm of MON to feedlot cattle, and did not observe any reduction in the DMI; however the authors reported an increase in ADG, and as a result, an improvement in G:F. In one of the first studies that evaluated doses of MON, Raun, Cooley, Potter, Rathmacher, and Richardson (1976) observed greater ADG (1.01 kg) at the dose of 11 ppm, and best feed-to-gain ratio (8.66) when animals were fed 33 ppm. In this study, the dose of 9 ppm was the closest to the 11 ppm used by Raun et al (1976), which may help to explain the greater ADG observed for yearling bulls fed 9 ppm of MON.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, G:F was improved in yearling bulls fed 9 ppm of MON, which is a consequence of the greater ADG just described. Likewise, Barducci et al (2013) fed 30 ppm of MON to feedlot cattle, and did not observe any reduction in the DMI; however the authors reported an increase in ADG, and as a result, an improvement in G:F. In one of the first studies that evaluated doses of MON, Raun, Cooley, Potter, Rathmacher, and Richardson (1976) observed greater ADG (1.01 kg) at the dose of 11 ppm, and best feed-to-gain ratio (8.66) when animals were fed 33 ppm. In this study, the dose of 9 ppm was the closest to the 11 ppm used by Raun et al (1976), which may help to explain the greater ADG observed for yearling bulls fed 9 ppm of MON.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DMI from days 0 to 42 was 8.1% greater for PAP1 compared with CON heifers and steers, whereas PAP3 was intermediate. Previous studies testing the effects of PAP did not report differences in DMI for beef steers ( DiLorenzo et al, 2008 ), cannulated Holstein cows ( Marino et al, 2011 ), or yearling bulls ( Barducci et al, 2013 ) consuming high grain diets. The differences between the previous reports in literature and the current experiment can be potentially explained by the type of diet used (finishing vs. backgrounding diets, respectively) and the slightly variation in PAP formulation of each study ( F. necrophorum or S. bovis ; S. bovis , F. necrophorum , Clostridium aminophilum , Clostridium sticklandii , and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius ; and S. bovis , F. necrophorum , Lactobacillus , and LPS for DiLorenzo et al, 2008 , Marino et al, 2011 , and Barducci et al, 2013 , respectively), which could change the magnitude of results when PAP is provided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%