2016
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adiabatically prepared spin‐lock approach for T1ρ‐based dynamic glucose enhanced MRI at ultrahigh fields

Abstract: An adiabatically prepared spin-lock preparation was presented that enables a homogeneous and chemical exchange sensitive T -based imaging at ultra-high field whole-body scanners, e.g., for T -based dynamic glucose enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 78:215-225, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
132
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(119 reference statements)
2
132
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, two CESL‐based DGE contrast metrics were investigated. First, the R 1ρ ‐weighted dynamic glucose‐enhanced (DGE ρ ) contrast calculated according to Schuenke et al:DGEnormalρfalse(normaltfalse)=normalS50msfalse(reffalse)-S50ms(t)normalS50msfalse(reffalse)·50ms,with S 50ms (t) being the acquired R 1ρ ‐weighted images for the spin‐lock time (TSL) = 50 ms (i.e., TSL 1 ), and S 50ms (ref) being the average of the first 20 S 50ms (t) images. Note, in comparison to the original definition, DGE ρ in Equation is divided by the respective TSL = 50 ms to enable a direct comparison of contrast values (in units of Hz) to the second DGE contrast metric investigated in this study (Equation ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, two CESL‐based DGE contrast metrics were investigated. First, the R 1ρ ‐weighted dynamic glucose‐enhanced (DGE ρ ) contrast calculated according to Schuenke et al:DGEnormalρfalse(normaltfalse)=normalS50msfalse(reffalse)-S50ms(t)normalS50msfalse(reffalse)·50ms,with S 50ms (t) being the acquired R 1ρ ‐weighted images for the spin‐lock time (TSL) = 50 ms (i.e., TSL 1 ), and S 50ms (ref) being the average of the first 20 S 50ms (t) images. Note, in comparison to the original definition, DGE ρ in Equation is divided by the respective TSL = 50 ms to enable a direct comparison of contrast values (in units of Hz) to the second DGE contrast metric investigated in this study (Equation ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the R 1ρ ‐weighted dynamic glucose‐enhanced (DGE ρ ) contrast calculated according to Schuenke et al:DGEnormalρfalse(normaltfalse)=normalS50msfalse(reffalse)-S50ms(t)normalS50msfalse(reffalse)·50ms,with S 50ms (t) being the acquired R 1ρ ‐weighted images for the spin‐lock time (TSL) = 50 ms (i.e., TSL 1 ), and S 50ms (ref) being the average of the first 20 S 50ms (t) images. Note, in comparison to the original definition, DGE ρ in Equation is divided by the respective TSL = 50 ms to enable a direct comparison of contrast values (in units of Hz) to the second DGE contrast metric investigated in this study (Equation ). Secondly, the difference in R 1ρ (ΔR 1ρ ) contrast, based on quantitative R 1ρ maps calculated according to Jin et al:ΔnormalR1ρfalse(normaltfalse)=R1ρfalse(normaltfalse)-normalR1ρfalse(reffalse),withR1ρfalse(tfalse)=lnS0.2 msfalse(tfalse)/S50 msfalse(tfalse)50 ms-0.2 ms,where S 0.2ms (t) are the acquired images for TSL = 0.2 ms (i.e., TSL 2 ), which in the following are referred to as images without R 1ρ weighting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) allows for indirect detection of diluted molecules by their saturation transfer to the abundant water pool . Many different diluted solutes were reported to be detectable with CEST such as peptides and proteins, with dependency on protein conformation, creatine, glutamate, or even injected solutes such as iopamidol, glucose, and glucose derivatives …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…normalB1+ inhomogeneity needs to be taken care of for quantitative imaging at UHF, including CEST. Solutions to the problem of CEST contrast variation caused by normalB1+ inhomogeneity include the use of adiabatic pulses and a simultaneous analysis of normalB1+ from acquired CEST data . Corrections can be applied in postprocessing and/or analysis when extra CEST measurements can be acquired at several levels of saturation normalB1+ amplitude .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%