1973
DOI: 10.1063/1.1662477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adiabatic third-order elastic constants of fused silica

Abstract: Results of ultrasonic harmonic generation are combined with those of ultrasonic beam mixing [R. W. Dunham and H. B. Huntington], to obtain a complete set of truly adiabatic third-order elastic constants of a strain-free sample of G.E. type 151 fused silica: C111+64.8±0.5×1011 dyn/cm2; C144=+5.4±0.3×1011 dyn/cm2; and C456=−1.32±0.08×1011 dyn/cm2. Differences among values of the third-order elastic constants for different samples are great enough that care in sample selection is necessary for consistent results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C αβ and C αβγ are second and third order elastic tensor components, respectively. Data are from Ref 15,[33][34][35]. .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C αβ and C αβγ are second and third order elastic tensor components, respectively. Data are from Ref 15,[33][34][35]. .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 These moduli were determined for synthetic fused silica with the acoustic harmonic generation technique combined with ultrasonic beam mixing. We calculated also the nonlinear constants for fused quartz ͑Herasil͒ 1 ϭϪ1.37 and 3 ϭϪ2.9 from the third-order moduli, measured for this material with the hydrostatic compression and uniaxial loading method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These anharmonic contributions are known to be the origin of many basic physical phenomena and properties such as the Grüneisen parameters, deviations from the Dulong-Petit law at high temperatures, thermal expansion and the existence of thermal resistance. While the second order elastic constants are not as well-studied and well-documented as their first order counterparts, methods for measuring them are well-developed and rather widely used, see for example (Bridgman, 1929;Hughes and Kelly, 1953;Crecraft, 1967;Powell and Skove, 1968;Gauster and Breazeale, 1968;Riley and Skove, 1973;Yost and Breazeale, 1973;Hiki, 1981;Krüger et al, 1991;Cavaillé et al, 2009;Kobelev et al, 2007;Payan et al, 2009). The implications of weakly nonlinear elasticity for materials failure remain largely unexplored (but see Knowles, 1981;Chow et al, 1986;Chen et al, 2004a,b;Livne et al, 2008Livne et al, , 2010Goldman et al, 2012), a situation that the present work aims to at least partially improve.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 93%