2014 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/hpec.2014.7040953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adiabatic quantum computing for finding low-peak-sidelobe codes

Abstract: Results are presented for an adiabatic quantum algorithm to compute low peak sidelobe binary and unimodular codes on a D-Wave 2 quantum computer. The quantum algorithm is benchmarked against a conventional genetic algorithm (GA). The quantum algorithm shows roughly a 100 times speedup relative to the GA for binary codes longer that 100 bits and is capable of producing low sidelobe binary codes up to length 426 on the current D-Wave 2 hardware. Results are presented for Doppler tolerant binary and quad-phase co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantum annealing is an approach to quantum computing where optimization and other problems are mapped such that their solutions correspond to the ground and low energy states of a Hamiltonian, and quantum fluctuations are used to solve the problem. Small proof-of-concept experiments have been performed based on a variety of real problems, with applications as diverse as cryptography [1], design of radar waveforms [2], protein folding [3], air traffic control [4], scheduling [5][6][7], and hydrology [8]. To the best of our knowledge, no scaling advantage has been observed on these devices for optimization, although recent work suggests one may be present for quantum simulation [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum annealing is an approach to quantum computing where optimization and other problems are mapped such that their solutions correspond to the ground and low energy states of a Hamiltonian, and quantum fluctuations are used to solve the problem. Small proof-of-concept experiments have been performed based on a variety of real problems, with applications as diverse as cryptography [1], design of radar waveforms [2], protein folding [3], air traffic control [4], scheduling [5][6][7], and hydrology [8]. To the best of our knowledge, no scaling advantage has been observed on these devices for optimization, although recent work suggests one may be present for quantum simulation [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complete list of all potential applications would be too long to give here. However applications have been studied in such diverse fields as finance [4], computer science [5], machine learning [6][7][8][9], communications [10][11][12][13], graph theory [14], and aeronautics [15], illustrating the importance of such algorithms to real world problems. While some of these applications rely on the ability of the QAA to perform optimization by finding the lowest energy state of a classical problem Hamiltonian, others such as [6][7][8][9][10]13], instead rely on the fact that open quantum systems effects allow for sampling of an approximate Boltzmann distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentally, this field is exciting because it allows for large-scale experiments on superconducting hardware designed to solve difficult optimization problems. Proof-of-concept studies have taken place on a diverse range of topics, including aerospace problems [13], [14], hydrology [15], radar waveform design [16], scheduling [17]- [19], and traffic flow optimization [20], [21]. While, to our knowledge, a scaling advantage for optimization has yet to be seen, signs of a potential advantage have been observed in recent quantum simulation experiments [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%