This
study presents an environmental assessment involving three
polyurethane adhesive technologies used in the footwear industry:
a solvent-based adhesive (SBA), a water-based adhesive (WBA), and
a powder-based adhesive (PBA). SBA is a versatile adhesive, but the
presence of volatile organic compounds has some disadvantages regarding
both environmental and workers’ welfare issues. On the other
hand, PBA and WBA require more complex processing than SBA. PBA is
a hot-melt adhesive in powder form and a solvent free thermoplastic
material, presenting lower risks to workers’ health and flammability,
but its application requires electric energy because it is carried
out by machine. Thus, a comparative study among these three polyurethane
adhesive technologies using a life cycle assessment methodology was
conducted from “cradle-to-gate”. Primary data for environmental
emissions, wastewater, chemical components, and technical specifications
were collected during visits in local. Based on the results, PBA decreased
environmental impacts in all categories evaluated except in the respiratory
organic category. Therefore, if the purpose of this analysis is to
look at the footwear workers’ health, WBA would be considered
the best technology. This work shows that any actions that seek to
minimize these impacts should begin in “the footwear industry”,
more specifically; in the stage of use due to the electricity required
during the adhesive application. Besides that, all three technologies
offer possibilities to minimize some of the environmental impacts.
Therefore, it is suggested that better management of the energy expended
during the application step from renewable energy sources, improvement
of equipment energy efficiency, and development of new formulations
are potential alternatives for solutions seeking to reduce impacts
involving all adhesive technologies and consequently shoe production.