1969
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1969.01610280047006
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Adhesive Tape Anhidrosis

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
11
1
0
0

Citation Types

1
3
1
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
3

Relationship

0
12

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 12 publications

(5 citation statements)
references

References 4 publications

1
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Willis (1973), too, found that even empty cups sealed to the skin caused appreciable sweat suppression. Gordon & Maibach's (1969) observation that an occlusive tape with a Zn-oxide backing (Hy-tape) caused the most pronounced anhidrosis is in conflict with our findings. In our hands, a similar tape suppressed bacterial growth; the lack of anhidrosis is, therefore, consistent with the hypothesis that bacteria play a decisive aetiological role.…”
Section: Comment
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings generally agree with the results of Gordon & Maibach (1969) and Orentreich et al (1966). Willis (1973), too, found that even empty cups sealed to the skin caused appreciable sweat suppression.…”
Section: Comment
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…Orentreich et al (1966) and Gordon & Maibach (1969) found that the degree of hypohidrosis induced by tapes was related directly to their occlusiveness. Permeable tapes were ineffective.…”
Section: Experiments 5; Effects Of Various Occlusive Systems
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile others were finding that occlusion for a few days would regularly induce anhidrosis. In an examination of tapes of differing occlusivity both Orentreich, Berger & Auerbach (1966) and Gordon & Maibach (1969) found that only those tapes which were completely impervious to water could induce a complete anhidrosis. The most striking finding in these studies was the long duration of reduced sweating.…”
Section: Historical Review
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Willis (1973), too, found that even empty cups sealed to the skin caused appreciable sweat suppression. Gordon & Maibach's (1969) observation that an occlusive tape with a Zn-oxide backing (Hy-tape) caused the most pronounced anhidrosis is in conflict with our findings. In our hands, a similar tape suppressed bacterial growth; the lack of anhidrosis is, therefore, consistent with the hypothesis that bacteria play a decisive aetiological role.…”
Section: Comment
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings generally agree with the results of Gordon & Maibach (1969) and Orentreich et al (1966). Willis (1973), too, found that even empty cups sealed to the skin caused appreciable sweat suppression.…”
Section: Comment
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…Orentreich et al (1966) and Gordon & Maibach (1969) found that the degree of hypohidrosis induced by tapes was related directly to their occlusiveness. Permeable tapes were ineffective.…”
Section: Experiments 5; Effects Of Various Occlusive Systems
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile others were finding that occlusion for a few days would regularly induce anhidrosis. In an examination of tapes of differing occlusivity both Orentreich, Berger & Auerbach (1966) and Gordon & Maibach (1969) found that only those tapes which were completely impervious to water could induce a complete anhidrosis. The most striking finding in these studies was the long duration of reduced sweating.…”
Section: Historical Review
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In contrast to microporous tapes, the silicone sheet produces anhidrosis within 6 days of occlusion, which requires 3 weeks for reversal. The anhidrosis may be due to occlusion of the eccrine duct or secretory coil of the sweat gland [15]. The benefits of microporous taping that have been described in the literature include minimized hypertrophic scars in surgically closed linear wounds [16] and improved scar appearance and scar perception by patients [17].…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%