2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adhesive stresses in axially-loaded tubular bonded joints—Part II: Development of an explicit closed-form solution for the Lubkin and Reissner model

Abstract: The literature presents several analytical models and solutions for single-and double-lap bonded joints, whilst the joint between circular tubes is less common. For this geometry the pioneering model is that of Lubkin and Reissner (Trans. ASME 78, 1956), in which the tubes are treated as cylindrical thin shells subjected to membrane and bending loading, whilst the adhesive transmits shear and peel stresses which are a function of the axial coordinate only. Such assumptions are consistent with those usually ado… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the latter, it must be pointed out that in the case of joint 2 − for which 2c/t = 2, R = 0.1 and β = 4 according to Lubkin and Reissner − it has been noticed that the values published in [1] correspond in reality to β = 5. This finding has been made possible because the Lubkin and Reissner approach has been reconsidered and solved analytically with an alternative method, presented in detail in the part II of the present work [15].…”
Section: Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the latter, it must be pointed out that in the case of joint 2 − for which 2c/t = 2, R = 0.1 and β = 4 according to Lubkin and Reissner − it has been noticed that the values published in [1] correspond in reality to β = 5. This finding has been made possible because the Lubkin and Reissner approach has been reconsidered and solved analytically with an alternative method, presented in detail in the part II of the present work [15].…”
Section: Theoretical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By pointing out the limitations of the literature models, the disclosed results provide a useful reference for first-approximation designs and to establish a correct starting point for further, more refined, theories. These arguments point out the need for an explicit, closed-form solution, which is presented in the second part of this work [15].…”
Section: Relevance Of the Results And Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing stress theoretical analysis mostly focuses on the bonding interface behavior in the elastic zone, and rarely involves the softening zone and debonding zone. Lubkin and Reissner (1956) studied the adhesive shear stress and normal stress by using the classical thin shell theory and later obtained the explicit closed-form solution by Laplace transform (Dragoni and Goglio, 2013; Goglio and Paolino, 2014). Shi and Cheng (1993) derived closed-form solutions by using the principle of minimal complementary energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using finite element findings on a variety of joint arrangements as mathematical milestones and expanding the investigations given in the literary works were also explored. Goglio and Paolino [ 10 ] re-examined Lubkin and Reissner’s [ 2 ] classic model for the tube junction under axial stress and developed a Laplace transform-based solution technique. Esmaeel and Taheri [ 11 ] investigated the impacts of erosion on the structural behavior of glued tube joints made of composite and aluminum adhesive layer, including the effects of two geometrical and loading parameters on the peel and shear stress variations in the epoxy matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%