2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-1226(03)00195-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adhesive retention dressings are more comfortable than alginate dressings on split-skin-graft donor sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The donor sites are dressed with a single layer of adherent retention dressing (eg Mefix or Hyperfix), gauze and then a second layer of adherent dressing as described by Hombrey et al 8 Negative pressure wound dressings are not used. Splints are avoided, except when the grafted areas are over joint surfaces.…”
Section: Current Management Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The donor sites are dressed with a single layer of adherent retention dressing (eg Mefix or Hyperfix), gauze and then a second layer of adherent dressing as described by Hombrey et al 8 Negative pressure wound dressings are not used. Splints are avoided, except when the grafted areas are over joint surfaces.…”
Section: Current Management Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ease of application and available resources/formularies are further aspects to consider. Many types of dressings have been studied for use in donor site wounds but none seem to fulfill all of these requirements ideally [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Furthermore, the results of these trials are not unanimous and sometimes even contradicting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although subsiding with the use of some hydrocellular dressings, pain and discomfort almost always remained a problem during dressing replacement which is done imperatively in the first 48 hours and a week following the procedure [3,9,32]. The elevated cost per unit of the above mentioned dressing however becomes consequential relative to the wound surface to be covered [9,33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%