2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40496-014-0030-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adhesion to Dental Ceramics

Abstract: All-ceramic restorations are attractive because of their long lasting esthetics and the ability to withstand the oral conditions. However, bonding to ceramics has challenged the dental community for the last few decades. The clinical success of a ceramic restoration is strongly dependent on the quality and durability of the bond between the resin cement and the restoration. This study presents the bonding mechanisms and the mechanical tests to evaluate the adhesive interfaces of resin-bonded ceramic restoratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical contribution to the adhesion process is dependent on the surface treatment and topography of the substrate and can be characterized by its surface energy. Alteration of the surface topography by etching or airborne particle abrasion results in changes on the surface area and on the wettability of the substrate, which are related to the surface energy and the adhesive potential [ 22 ]. A rough surface increases the mechanical retention by enabling the adhesive to interlock with the surface irregularities created by the different conditioning methods [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical contribution to the adhesion process is dependent on the surface treatment and topography of the substrate and can be characterized by its surface energy. Alteration of the surface topography by etching or airborne particle abrasion results in changes on the surface area and on the wettability of the substrate, which are related to the surface energy and the adhesive potential [ 22 ]. A rough surface increases the mechanical retention by enabling the adhesive to interlock with the surface irregularities created by the different conditioning methods [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GIC and resin-modified GIC (RMGIC) are often used to cement acid-resistant ceramics, mostly because these cements are very easy to use. However, the most popular and effective cements for all types of ceramic restorations are the resin-based composites, including the systems containing the 10-methacryloyloxydecyl-dihydrogen-phosphate (MDP) monomer [2,45,47]. …”
Section: Resin Bonding To Zirconiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be true if the restoration would not be bonded to the tooth structure or remaining restorative materials (e.g . , composites and metals), working as an integrated system where diverse stresses, from chewing to para-functional habits (e.g., bruxism), are distributed throughout the system due to appropriate bonding [ 2 , 45 ]. This rationale is supported by the ISO 6872:2010 [ 46 ] standard that classifies the ceramics according to the intended clinical use and made the distinction between adhesively and non-adhesively cemented restorations.…”
Section: Resin Bonding To Zirconiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations