2012
DOI: 10.1021/la3010272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adhesion Properties of Uric Acid Crystal Surfaces

Abstract: Two key steps in kidney stone formation--crystal aggregation and attachment to renal tissues--depend on the surface adhesion properties of the crystalline components. Anhydrous uric acid (UA) is the most common organic crystalline phase found in human kidney stones. Using chemical force microscopy, the adhesion force between various functional groups and the largest (100) surface of UA single crystals was measured in both aqueous solution and model urine. Adhesion trends in the two solutions were identical, bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, adhesion forces on the largest crystal face of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) crystals, measured in solution, are significantly greater than those measured on the largest face of calcium oxalate dihydrate, explaining the higher propensity of COM crystals to form stones. CFM experiments performed on l -cystine crystals demonstrated comparable surface adhesion of different habits and polymorphs of l -cystine crystals, thereby ruling out the possibility of aggravating stone formation by a shift in crystal morphology, further illustrating the practical utility of this methodology . CFM also was used to investigate the effects of common urinary constituents in l -cystine stone formation, and others have used CFM to study cholesterol monohydrate, uric acid and monosodium urate monohydrate crystals. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, adhesion forces on the largest crystal face of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) crystals, measured in solution, are significantly greater than those measured on the largest face of calcium oxalate dihydrate, explaining the higher propensity of COM crystals to form stones. CFM experiments performed on l -cystine crystals demonstrated comparable surface adhesion of different habits and polymorphs of l -cystine crystals, thereby ruling out the possibility of aggravating stone formation by a shift in crystal morphology, further illustrating the practical utility of this methodology . CFM also was used to investigate the effects of common urinary constituents in l -cystine stone formation, and others have used CFM to study cholesterol monohydrate, uric acid and monosodium urate monohydrate crystals. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uric acid has a high nitrogen content ($33 wt%), and its crystals can adhere to surfaces bearing various organic functionalities, and via multiple types of forces (electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding and/or van der Waals interactions), without the aid of surfactants. 57 These properties allowed the copyrolysis of graphene oxide and uric acid to produce a nitrogendoped reduced graphene oxide (rGO) with nitrogen atoms in all of the possible congurations in the graphitic lattice, a high total nitrogen content with a high ratio of pyridinic N and graphitic N and a high surface area aer pyrolysis. As a result, the N-doped graphene had both high capacitance and bifunctional electrocatalytic activity towards oxygen reduction and evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uric acid, because of its good adhesive properties, can form hydrogen bonds with carboxyl groups with an adhesion force of 1.62 nN. 44 During the sonication and stirring at 80 °C, because of its excellent surface attachment properties, the uric acid can be intercalated inside the graphene layers, interconnecting the graphene layers and o-CNTs by forming hydrogen bonds with the carboxyl groups. The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra (Figure 2) show a comparison of the UA, the binary mixture of graphene oxide with oxidized carbon nanotube (GO/o-CNT), and the ternary composition of (GO/UA/o-CNT).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attachment to the graphene oxide of the oxidized carbon nanotube took place through the formation of hydrogen bonding between the amino groups of uric acid (UA) and the carboxylic groups of GO and o-CNT. Uric acid, because of its good adhesive properties, can form hydrogen bonds with carboxyl groups with an adhesion force of 1.62 nN . During the sonication and stirring at 80 °C, because of its excellent surface attachment properties, the uric acid can be intercalated inside the graphene layers, interconnecting the graphene layers and o-CNTs by forming hydrogen bonds with the carboxyl groups.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%