Adhesion of Teeth

Zhao, Zhihui; Wang, Qihui; Zhao, Jing; Zhao, Bo; Ma, Zhangyu; Zhang, Congxiao

doi:10.3389/fmats.2020.615225

Cited by 13 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The surface state incorporates all the chemical, structural, and topographic features of the material. In practice, the surface is always filled with flaws and variations ( Zhao et al, 2021 ). Wettability is the first and most appropriate timeframe for any adhesion mechanism to succeed.…”

Section: Adhesion Principlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adhesion concepts and techniques for laboratory-processed indirect dental restorations

Alsadon

2022

The Saudi Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Adhesion Principlesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adhesion concepts and techniques for laboratory-processed indirect dental restorations

Alsadon

2022

The Saudi Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In this case, the independent acid etching step was omitted. Tooth bonding is a complex physical and chemical process [ 82 , 83 ].…”

Section: Dental Bonding Agentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rheological and Mechanical Properties of Resin-Based Materials Applied in Dental Restorations

Zhang

Meng

et al. 2021

Polymers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resin-based materials have been prevalent for dental restorations over the past few decades and have been widely used for a variety of direct and indirect procedures. Typically, resin-based dental materials are required to be flowable or moldable before setting and can provide adequate mechanical strength after setting. The setting method may include, but is not limited to, light-curing, self-curing or heating. In this review, based on different indications of resin-based dental materials (e.g., dental filling composite, dental bonding agent, resin luting cement), their rheological and mechanical properties were reviewed. Viscous and flexible properties were focused on for materials before setting, while elastic properties and mechanical strength were focused on for materials after setting. At the same time, the factors that may affect their rheological and mechanical properties were discussed. It is anticipated that the insightful information and prospections of this study will be useful to the future development and fabrication of resin-based dental restorative materials.

show abstract

“…Evolution of the dental adhesive systems can be identified in terms of elemental composition in the materials with their internal chemistry, application procedure, and clinical performance [8][9][10]. 7 th generation bonding agents are now available in the market and these are also known as single-solution or all-in-one products.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Based Composites to Biodentine with Three Types of Seventh-Generation Bonding Agents: An In Vitro Study

Al-Ibraheemi

Hanoon

Haider

2022

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Aim. Biodentine refers to a bioactive material commonly applied for dental restoration in clinical practice, but poor adhesion of the Biodentine to the restorative materials could affect the quality and long-term integrity of the final restoration. The study aimed to assess shear bond strength (SBS) of two resin-based composites to Biodentine using three commercially available 7th generation bonding agents. Methods. Forty-eight acrylic blocks having central holes with a nominal diameter of 4 mm and a depth of 2 mm were prepared. The holes of the acrylic blocks were filled with Biodentine, which was prepared following the guidelines provided by the manufacturer. Then, the specimens were divided into six groups (n = 8). Groups 1, 2, and 3, Tetric N-Ceram composite bonded to Biodentine with Tetric N-bond, Xeno V+, Bond Force bond, respectively. Group 4, 5, and 6, Filtek Z350 bonded to Biodentine with the same three adhesives. The specimens were placed in distilled water for 24 hours and tested for the SBS in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The test data were listed in a table and independent samples t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted as a part of the statistical analysis. Results. The Tetric N bonding agent achieved the highest SBS followed by Bond Force, and Xeno V and highly significant difference was found. On the other hand, an overall increase in the SBS values of the Tetric N-Ceram resin was noticed in comparison with the Filtek Z350 and the differences was statistically significant. Although the specimens failed in adhesive, cohesive and mixed fracture modes but the cohesive was found to be the dominant failure mode in all groups. Conclusion. Among the tested bonding agents and resin composites, the Tetric N-Ceram composite bonded by Tetric N-bond self-etch adhesive with the Biodentine showed the highest SBS compared to the other combinations.

show abstract

Adhesion of Teeth

Cited by 13 publications

References 40 publications

Adhesion concepts and techniques for laboratory-processed indirect dental restorations

Adhesion concepts and techniques for laboratory-processed indirect dental restorations

Rheological and Mechanical Properties of Resin-Based Materials Applied in Dental Restorations

Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Based Composites to Biodentine with Three Types of Seventh-Generation Bonding Agents: An In Vitro Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About