2002
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-65.3.534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adhesion of Dairy Propionibacteria to Intestinal Epithelial Tissue In Vitro and In Vivo

Abstract: Adhesion to the intestinal mucosa is a desirable property for probiotic microorganisms and has been related to many of their health benefits. In the present study, 24 dairy Propionibacterium strains were assessed with regard to their hydrophobic characteristics and their autoaggregation and hemagglutination abilities, since these traits have been shown to be indicative of adherence in other microorganisms. Six strains were further tested for their capacity to adhere to ileal epithelial cells in vitro and in vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of these results, one concludes that there is no correlation between auto-aggregation and hydrophobicity, also found by others using xylene (Zárate, Morata de Ambrosini, Chaia, & González, 2002) e but not by Darilmaz, Beyatli, and Yuksekdah (2012). However, the values obtained for the strains tested (except FF28 strain) were higher than those found for LCS strains, in agreement with previously reported values (Kiely & Olson, 2000).…”
Section: Auto-aggregation Co-aggregation and Cell Surface Hydrophobimentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of these results, one concludes that there is no correlation between auto-aggregation and hydrophobicity, also found by others using xylene (Zárate, Morata de Ambrosini, Chaia, & González, 2002) e but not by Darilmaz, Beyatli, and Yuksekdah (2012). However, the values obtained for the strains tested (except FF28 strain) were higher than those found for LCS strains, in agreement with previously reported values (Kiely & Olson, 2000).…”
Section: Auto-aggregation Co-aggregation and Cell Surface Hydrophobimentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Transient adhesion and colonization of probiotics is thus to be determined in vivo, although a clear correlation between in vitro and in vivo adhesion has been reported for six strains of propionic bacteria using experimental animals (Zárate et al, 2002).…”
Section: Caco-2 Cell Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscopic examination revealed two adhesion patterns in propionibacteria: autoaggregating strains adhere in clusters, with adhesion being mediated by only a few bacteria, whereas nonautoaggregating propionibacteria adhere individually making contact with each epithelial cell with the entire bacterial surface [140].…”
Section: Safety and Persistence In The Gutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dairy propionibacteria have demonstrated to adhere to immobilized mucus [139]; to isolated mouse intestinal epithelial cells [140,141], to human intestinal cell lines [142][143][144] and in vivo to intestinal cells as was assessed by counting the adhering propionibacteria on the mucosa by a plate count method [124,125,137,145].…”
Section: Safety and Persistence In The Gutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Propionibacterium freudenreichii is able to stimulate the growth of bifidobacteria in vitro [15,29] and some selected strains partially survive during their transit in the human gut and display bifidogenic activity [5,12]. Propionibacterium acidipropionici CRL 1198 is able to survive in mice intestine, adhering to the epithelium, and induces positive effects on lipid metabolism, on intestinal flora activity [35,36,48] and on immune response [2,27,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%