2013
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2013.2253451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adhesion and Friction Behavior of Magnetic Disks With Ultrathin Perfluoropolyether Lubricant Films Having Different End-Groups Measured Using Pin-on-Disk Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively larger zero-load friction force for the lower molecular weight D-4OH is attributed to its larger molecular polarity [13,14]. and 1500, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The relatively larger zero-load friction force for the lower molecular weight D-4OH is attributed to its larger molecular polarity [13,14]. and 1500, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, the following analysis was performed using the relationship between the load and the frictional force. The contact between a plane and spherical surfaces has been discussed at length in the Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR) theory [8,[11][12][13] considering the force of adhesion. If the load is, W 0 the adhesive force acting between the spherical and plane surfaces is W a , the radius of curvature of the spherical surface is R, and the adhesive energy between the spherical and plane surfaces is γ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here γ 0 is the surface energy of bulk lubricant and A* is an effective Hamaker constant [25][26][27]. Waltman et al [26] evaluated the effective Hamaker constant of Z-Tetraol (molecular weight is 2000) to be 1.9 × 10 −19 J and used this value in [18].…”
Section: Calculated Diffusion Coefficients and Comparison With Experimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waltman et al [26] evaluated the effective Hamaker constant of Z-Tetraol (molecular weight is 2000) to be 1.9 × 10 −19 J and used this value in [18]. On the other hand, Tani et al [27] experimentally evaluated A* to be 4.8 × 10 −19 J. Therefore, the bulk viscosities were calculated for the Hamaker constant values of 0.47 × 10 −19 and 1.9 × 10 −19 J in Table 1.…”
Section: Calculated Diffusion Coefficients and Comparison With Experimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation