2022
DOI: 10.1002/nau.24986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adherence to professional society guidelines among women with stress or mixed urinary incontinence

Abstract: Aims The objective of this analysis was to describe longitudinal adherence with recommended urinary incontinence (UI) evaluation and treatment guidelines over a 2‐year period in patients newly diagnosed with stress (SUI) or mixed UI (MUI), and average 2‐year cost associated with initial treatment. Methods A retrospective claims analysis using the IBM MarketScan database was conducted. Women diagnosed with SUI/MUI between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2016 were identified using the International Classification of D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…UI has negative impacts on physical and psychosocial health and conveys significant economic burden to individuals and society [ 2 6 ]. First-line care for all major subtypes of UI (stress, urgency, and mixed) includes pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) [ 7 ], and yet only a small percentage of women undergo PFMT prior to advancing to medications, procedures, or surgical interventions to address their symptoms [ 8 ]. Many women do not engage in first-line care at all, instead receiving more advanced treatments such as medication or surgery as their first treatment [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…UI has negative impacts on physical and psychosocial health and conveys significant economic burden to individuals and society [ 2 6 ]. First-line care for all major subtypes of UI (stress, urgency, and mixed) includes pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) [ 7 ], and yet only a small percentage of women undergo PFMT prior to advancing to medications, procedures, or surgical interventions to address their symptoms [ 8 ]. Many women do not engage in first-line care at all, instead receiving more advanced treatments such as medication or surgery as their first treatment [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First-line care for all major subtypes of UI (stress, urgency, and mixed) includes pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) [ 7 ], and yet only a small percentage of women undergo PFMT prior to advancing to medications, procedures, or surgical interventions to address their symptoms [ 8 ]. Many women do not engage in first-line care at all, instead receiving more advanced treatments such as medication or surgery as their first treatment [ 8 ]. There are many explanations for this failure to utilize first-line care, including a lack of confidence in PFMT that has been expressed by clinicians, skepticism regarding efficacy by patients themselves, and difficulty accessing care owing to constraints of time, cost, or provider availability [ 9 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data suggests that 67% of women experience symptom improvement or resolution with PFMT [6]. Despite high UI prevalence and strong evidence to support behavioral interventions for UI, most women are untreated or undertreated for these conditions [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, when UI is reported to a provider, many do not receive appropriate treatment options. A recent retrospective analysis of nearly 104,000 medical claims from women diagnosed with stress UI or mixed UI found only 6.8% and 7.7% of women with stress UI and mixed UI, respectively, received treatment adherent to clinical guidelines (Pan et al, 2022). While the Women's Preventive Services Initiative (O'Reilly et al, 2018) recommends annual screenings for UI in women using a validated instrument, the American Academy of Family Physicians has expressed resistance to this recommendation, citing the paucity of research on the adverse effect of screening and the lack of knowledge regarding how or if early intervention improves outcomes (Shaughnessy, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%