2020
DOI: 10.1177/0969141320919152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adherence to national guidelines for colorectal cancer screening in Israel: Comprehensive multi-year assessment based on electronic medical records

Abstract: Objectives To assess time trends in colorectal cancer screening uptake, time-to-colonoscopy completion following a positive fecal occult blood test and associated patient factors, and the extent and predictors of longitudinal screening adherence in Israel. Setting Nation-wide population-based study using data collected from four health maintenance organizations for the Quality Indicators in Community Healthcare Program. Methods Screening uptake for the eligible population (aged 50–74) was recorded 2003–2018 us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. There are no organized CRC screening programmes in African or eastern Mediterranean regions with the exception of Israel, which has implemented an annual FIT screening for individuals 50-74 years of age84 , and Abu Dhabi, which recommends colonoscopy screening for individuals over the age of 40 years 3 . Regardless of modality, screening rates are far from ideal (often close to 20%) and efforts directed at expanding options for CRC screening, patient selection, navigation to a colonoscopy if a non-invasive test is positive and adequate follow-up are needed (TaBle2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. There are no organized CRC screening programmes in African or eastern Mediterranean regions with the exception of Israel, which has implemented an annual FIT screening for individuals 50-74 years of age84 , and Abu Dhabi, which recommends colonoscopy screening for individuals over the age of 40 years 3 . Regardless of modality, screening rates are far from ideal (often close to 20%) and efforts directed at expanding options for CRC screening, patient selection, navigation to a colonoscopy if a non-invasive test is positive and adequate follow-up are needed (TaBle2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it suggests that males, elders (age > 60) and smokers who were identified as high-risk individuals of colorectal neoplasms in the preliminary screening stage should be given priority to refer for colonoscopy. These subpopulations, usually presenting low screening rate of CRC [39,40], need to be paid extra effort to raise their awareness and compliance for colonoscopy screening. Second, age, gender and smoking were just qualitatively incorporated in some risk scoring systems for CRC screening [41][42][43] (e.g., Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening score).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study based on QICH data assessed the contribution that factors such as body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking had on colorectal cancer screening rates. 42 Although these factors were statistically significantly associated with reduced screening rates, their contributions to screening rates were small.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 96%