Some cancer-surgeries are best poised to lead a change in thromboprophylaxis.Gynecological cancers (GYN-ONC) have been grouped to equate a high thrombosis risk, 1,2 this welcomes the strong interest on implementing effective strategies to reduce the burden of cancer-associated thrombosis. Indeed, there is general agreement by major societies that 4 weeks of post-surgical thromboprophylaxis is the standard of care in gynecology-oncology. 3 Yet not everyone is my costumer, understanding the heterogeneous rates if venous thromboembolism (VTE) after GYN-ONC surgery and comparing the efficacy of anticoagulants beyond low molecular weigh heparin will mark the pace in the evolution of thromboprophylaxis. VALERIA (Venous thromboembolism prophylAxis after gynecoLogical pElvic cancer surgery with RIvaroxaban vs enoxAparin) in this version of The Journal, is moving the dial.Using mandatory ultrasound, in the VALERIA trial the authors found 4 events in the (3.5%) of 114 patients assigned to post operative rivaroxaban 10 mg PO and 5 events (4.4%) among the 114 patients assigned to SC enoxaparin 40 mg for 30 days. The composite safety outcome of major bleed or clinically relevant non major bleed was low with no events in the rivaroxaban group (0%) and 3 in the enoxaparin arm (2.6%). The results are encouraging in suggesting rivaroxaban as an alternative to enoxaparin in GYN ONC prophylaxis, yet the trial was stopped early, and these results are exploratory. The reported rates are comparable those described at 90 days in a retrospective comparison of by Swaroop et al which also compared enoxaparin (4.3%) to rivaroxaban (2.4%) after GYN-ONG surgery. 4 Partially explained by the screening ultrasound, the rates of VTE are sobering, nonetheless that our best practice still found 1 in 25 patients to have VTE perioperatively. It is generally accepted that incidentally found thrombotic events herald morbidity in patients with cancer. As we expand on thromboprophylaxis alternatives, shall we also re-learn the lessons of risk stratification? Against this background, in a 63 000-patient report by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) the 30-day incidence of VTE in GYN-ONC surgery dropped from 1.7% to 0.9% in the last decade. The incidence is higher in patients with ovarian (2.4%) and uterine cancer (2.4%) relative to those with cervical cancer (1.1%). Thus, assigning high risk tier to all GYN-ONC may be oversimplified. Currently, no predictive strategy is validated to target preventive tactics to the patients with highest risk, yet this group includes those with low albumin, disseminated cancer, ascites, longer or high complexity surgery. 5 The Caprini risk score is widely used in perioperative VTE risk prediction, thus, in a cohort of 1123 GYN-ONC surgical patients the use of the Caprini score predicted patients at the highest risk thrombosis. 6,7 In VALERIA, less than half the patients were reported to have a high Caprini score, it remains to be described if a risk-based thrombosis p...