Abstract:Background
It is currently unknown if antihypertensive drugs can be monitored in oral fluid (
OF
) using liquid chromatography coupled to high‐resolution mass spectrometry.
Methods and Results
We assessed adherence using liquid chromatography coupled to high‐resolution mass spectrometry in
OF
, plasma, and urine of 56 consecutive patients with hypertension referred to a tertiary hypertension unit. Of these patients, … Show more
“…Кроме того, разработаны и валидированы другие прямые методы -качественный метод оценки приверженности АГП, например, по анализу ротовой жидкости [12,13].…”
Section: терапевтический лекарственный мониторинг для оценки комплаен...unclassified
Low adherence of patients to antihypertensive therapy remains an urgent problem and is recognized as the main cause of insufficient BP control at the population level. In this regard, to increase the motivation of patients in clinical practice, methods for assessing adherence (compliance) to drugs. Along with indirect assessment methods (questionnaires, self-reports, pill counts, etc.), which, however, do not always reflect the real patients adherence, more objective is the measurement of antihypertensive drug concentrations in physiological fluids therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). For these purposes, methods of high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry were recently adapted, reference ranges of antihypertensive drug concentrations in blood serum and urine for standard doses of drugs were determined, as well as criteria for assessing complete or partial non-compliance. There have been a number of studies using TDM to assess adherence, which show a high rate of non-compliance (low compliance) of more than 50% of cases with a variability from 25 to 86.1%, with complete non-compliance 10.134.5% in patients with uncontrolled and/or resistant hypertension (3 antihypertensive drug). In a population of patients with a normal course of hypertension, taking 12 antihypertensive drug, the level of non-compliance according to the results of TDM did not exceed 10%. Comparison of the TDM method with indirect methods of assessing adherence did not reveal consistency; at the same time, the detection of antihypertensive drug better characterized the clinical problems of patients with arterial hypertension. In clinical practice, direct assessment methods (TDM) can be used to measure adherence in problem patients with uncontrolled hypertension and high cardiovascular risk despite optimal therapy.
“…Кроме того, разработаны и валидированы другие прямые методы -качественный метод оценки приверженности АГП, например, по анализу ротовой жидкости [12,13].…”
Section: терапевтический лекарственный мониторинг для оценки комплаен...unclassified
Low adherence of patients to antihypertensive therapy remains an urgent problem and is recognized as the main cause of insufficient BP control at the population level. In this regard, to increase the motivation of patients in clinical practice, methods for assessing adherence (compliance) to drugs. Along with indirect assessment methods (questionnaires, self-reports, pill counts, etc.), which, however, do not always reflect the real patients adherence, more objective is the measurement of antihypertensive drug concentrations in physiological fluids therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). For these purposes, methods of high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry were recently adapted, reference ranges of antihypertensive drug concentrations in blood serum and urine for standard doses of drugs were determined, as well as criteria for assessing complete or partial non-compliance. There have been a number of studies using TDM to assess adherence, which show a high rate of non-compliance (low compliance) of more than 50% of cases with a variability from 25 to 86.1%, with complete non-compliance 10.134.5% in patients with uncontrolled and/or resistant hypertension (3 antihypertensive drug). In a population of patients with a normal course of hypertension, taking 12 antihypertensive drug, the level of non-compliance according to the results of TDM did not exceed 10%. Comparison of the TDM method with indirect methods of assessing adherence did not reveal consistency; at the same time, the detection of antihypertensive drug better characterized the clinical problems of patients with arterial hypertension. In clinical practice, direct assessment methods (TDM) can be used to measure adherence in problem patients with uncontrolled hypertension and high cardiovascular risk despite optimal therapy.
“…Other methods of antihypertensive agent detection in body fluids exist. Although urine analysis is the most commonly used, other methods such as detection in oral fluids or dried blood spots are currently being investigated 126,127 . The main advantage of serum drug measurement over urine detection of drugs is that it allows not only detection of antihypertensive agents, but also their quantification.…”
Section: Paper Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable variation in the extent of nonadherence among patients with hypertension, largely depending on the particular method of assessment that has been applied. 10,13–15…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable variation in the extent of nonadherence among patients with hypertension, largely depending on the particular method of assessment that has been applied. 10,[13][14][15] In this nationwide cross-sectional multicenter cohort study, we aimed to assess the prevalence of nonadherence among Norwegian hypertensive patients using ≥2 antihypertensive agents by using direct measurements of serum drug concentrations, characterize drug regimens in nonadherent patients, and investigate other associated factors of nonadherence to antihypertensive medication. In addition, we aimed to assess the accuracy of 2 indirect methods namely patient-reported nonadherence and physician-reported nonadherence, by comparing them to the direct method of serum drug concentrations.…”
Nonadherence to drugs is a challenge in hypertension treatment. We aimed to assess the prevalence of nonadherence by serum drug concentrations compared with 2 indirect methods and relate to the prescribed drug regimens in a nationwide multicenter study. Five hundred fifty patients with hypertension using ≥2 antihypertensive agents participated. We measured concentrations of 23 antihypertensive drugs using ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry and compared with patients’ self-reports and investigators’ assessment based on structured interview. We identified 40 nonadherent patients (7.3%) using serum drug concentrations. They had higher office diastolic blood pressure (90 versus 83 mm Hg,
P
<0.01) and daytime diastolic blood pressure (85 versus 80 mm Hg,
P
<0.01) though systolic blood pressures did not differ significantly. They had more prescribed daily antihypertensive pills (2.5 versus 2.1 pills,
P
<0.01) and total daily pills (5.5 versus 4.4 pills,
P
=0.03). Prescription of fixed-dose combination pills were lower among the nonadherent patients identified by serum concentrations (45.0 versus 67.1%,
P
<0.01). Fifty-three patients self-reported nonadherence, while the investigators suspected 69 nonadherent patients. These groups showed no or few differences in drug regimens, respectively. In summary, we detected 7.3% prevalence of nonadherence by serum drug measurements in patients using ≥2 antihypertensive agents in a nationwide study; they had higher office and ambulatory diastolic blood pressures, higher number of prescribed daily pills, more daily antihypertensive pills, and less frequent prescriptions of fixed-dose combination pills. Indirect methods showed poor overlap with serum drugs concentrations and no or minimal medication differences. Thus, serum measurements of drugs were useful in detection and characterization of nonadherence to antihypertensive treatment.
REGISTRATION:
URL:
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov
; Unique identifier: NCT03209154.
“…Na grande maioria das vezes ela é assintomática e é necessário manter uma regularidade das mensurações da PA no consultório médico onde também será avaliado quais possíveis fatores de risco para indicação de um tratamento mais ajustado(OPARIL et al, 2018).Novas abordagens farmacológicas são necessárias para melhorar o controle da PA e, claro, a resposta dos pacientes aos medicamentos também são vitais no desenvolvimento dessas novas abordagens(LOBO et al, 2017). Consequentemente, avaliar a adesão dos pacientes hipertensos é uma etapa importante do tratamento para orientar melhores intervenções farmacológicas e que sejam mais especificas(LAUDER et al, 2020).O tratamento da HAS tem como propósito impedir a progressão da doença ou complicações oriundas, proporcionar qualidade de vida a essas pessoas, reduzindo a morbimortalidade(MARTÍNEZ-SÁMANO et al, 2018). Os medicamentos disponíveis no mercado estão agrupados em classes conforme seus mecanismos de ação.…”
Alpha-Terpineol is a promising monoterpene for studies related to hypertension due to its action in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive rats (SABINO et al., 2013). The present work aims to analyze the possible mechanisms of action of Alpha-Terpineol in A7r5 smooth muscle cells that may explain the hypotensive action of this monoterpene observed in vivo. We used cell culture, cell viability analysis and Alpha-Terpineol cytotoxicity using the MTT assay, RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis. We used the MTT cell viability test at 24, 48 and 72 hours of incubation. Results demonstrate that in the cytotoxicity tests, alpha-terpineol promoted cell death only at the highest concentration of 10 -2 M, in the periods of 24 and 48 hours. Within 72 hours there was a reduction in cell viability at concentrations of 10 -5 and 10 -3 M and cell death at concentration of 10 -2 M. To investigate possible changes in mRNA of adenosine A2A receptors, mRNA expression was evaluated by real-time PCR. A statistically significant increase in mRNA expression of adenosine A2A receptors in A7r5 cells was observed following 6 hour-treatment with Alpha-Terpineol concentration of 10 -8 M. Using in Cell Western Blotting assay the expression of A2a receptor was significantly reduced by Alpha-Terpineol at all periods tested. Our data show that Alpha-Terpineol action on smooth muscle cells may involve adenosine A2A receptors and open new perspectives for studying its mechanism of action in these cells.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.