2020
DOI: 10.1177/0194599820922155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adherence to American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Objective Clinical practice guidelines synthesize and disseminate the best available evidence to guide clinical decisions and increase high-quality care. Since 2004, the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO-HNSF) has published 16 guidelines. The objective of this review was to evaluate clinicians’ adherence to these guidelines’ recommendations as measured in the literature. Data Sources We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science on August 29, 2019, for studies published … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13 Although there are identified advantages to CPGs, evidence suggests a lack of adherence to CPGs in otolaryngology. [14][15][16][17][18] Additionally, CPGs display a range of differences in their development process, methodological quality, and content. [19][20][21] This variability can act as a nidus for bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12,13 Although there are identified advantages to CPGs, evidence suggests a lack of adherence to CPGs in otolaryngology. [14][15][16][17][18] Additionally, CPGs display a range of differences in their development process, methodological quality, and content. [19][20][21] This variability can act as a nidus for bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPGs aim to improve the quality of care by dissemination of the best available evidence into recommendations to provide the most appropriate clinical care and have many advantages—such as aiding decision‐making by relevant up‐to‐date evidence, improving health care consistency, promoting health service equity, and reducing inadequate variability in clinical practice 12,13 . Although there are identified advantages to CPGs, evidence suggests a lack of adherence to CPGs in otolaryngology 14–18 . Additionally, CPGs display a range of differences in their development process, methodological quality, and content 19–21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the rate of application of the BC for GBS diagnosis with level 1 diagnostic certainty was lower (13.4%) than in studies conducted in the Netherlands, India and Bangladesh, which met the criteria for level 1 in 61%, 62% and 58% of the patients, respectively [7][8][9] . This finding might be explained by lack of knowledge of these criteria and the recommendations for its use, or by physicians' disagreement with their use 15,16 . In addition, the lower proportion of Peruvian neurologists, in contrast with the World Health Organization recommendations, may have contributed to lower use of the BC 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 38 The authors stated that not all children with adenotonsillar hypertrophy suffer also from sleep breathing disorders and that the correlation between the degree of lymphatic structures hypertrophy and the severity of obstructive respiratory symptoms is not linear. However, the same authors discuss the efficacy of adenotonsillectomy for pediatric OSAS and, according to the guidelines for tonsillectomy (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery), 39 suggest to consider the surgical therapeutic option also for PANDAS/PANS patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%