Adherence Rate, Barriers to Attend, Safety, and Overall Experience of a Remote Physical Exercise Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic for Individuals After Stroke

Abstract

Introduction: The actions taken by the government to deal with the consequences of the coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused different levels of restriction on the mobility of the population. The need to continue offering physical exercise to individuals after stroke became an emergency. However, these individuals may have barriers to adhere to the programs delivered remotely. There is a lack of evidence related to adherence, attendance, safety, and satisfaction of remote exercise programs for this population.Objective: The aim was to evaluate adherence and barriers to attend a remote physical exercise program for individuals after stroke. We aimed (a) to identify adherence and attendance rate of the remote physical exercise program (i.e., number of participants engaged, number of sessions attended, and exercise time in remote program); (b) to identify the safety of a remote physical exercise program (i.e., falls, pain, or dizziness when performing the exercises, fear, or insecurity); and (c) to identify the overall experience to participate in a remote program.Materials and methods: This is a longitudinal study, including 36 stroke survivors who already attended a face-to-face physical exercise program prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The remote physical exercise program included sessions for 2 days/week for a duration of 22 weeks, with a total of 44 sessions, which were delivered asynchrony via recorded video sessions. As outcome measures, we performed two questionnaires (via weekly telephone calls) to identify attendance, barriers, safety, and overall experience related to the program.Results: The adherence rate was 86 (9%). The attendance rate was 19, with a total of 8 sessions (108.3 min/week). The main barriers for lower attendance rate were as follows: lack of motor skills and physical fitness to workout in 80 reports (20.6%), followed by no exercise companion in 44 reports (11.3%). The remote physical program has been shown to be safe, and the overall experience was positive from the perspectives of the participants and the family members.Conclusion: Although the adherence rate was high, the attendance rate was low on the remote physical exercise program. The main barriers to attending the program remotely reflect the need of tailoring individually an asynchrony mode of delivering the sessions to individuals after stroke. Our results also indicate how the COVID-19 impacted the health conditions of stroke survivors. The program was safe, and the overall experience indicated a change in the mental, physical, and social health of individuals after stroke and their family members.

Adherence rate, barriers to attend, safety and overall experience of a physical exercise program via telemonitoring during COVID‐19 pandemic for individuals with Parkinson's disease: A feasibility study

“…Once a month, the intern team called the participants and their family members or caregivers to evaluate the overall experience for the past 4 weeks. The Overall Experience is a questionnaire (based on 5 levels Likert scale) composed by 12 questions about participant's perception about quality of life, interpersonal relationships, and the telemonitoring program, and 6 questions about caregiver's activities from “totally disagree (1 point)” to “totally agree (5)”] (Torriani‐Pasin et al., 2021 ).…”

Effects of internet-based exercise intervention on depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Research supports the effectiveness of remote or home-based exercise programs as viable alternatives to traditional training methods. [13][14][15][16] These digital programs offer several advantages, including reduced infection risks, flexible scheduling, and minimal space requirements. [17] In this context, our study defines internet-based exercise as engaging in physical activity guided or supervised via online platforms, including websites and smartphone APPs.…”

Evaluations of virtual exercise programmes for adults with mobility limitations: a scoping review protocol incorporating an equity lens to inform the development of strategies to optimise participation of under-represented groups

“…Delivery of exercise programmes may be completely remote, a hybrid model (a combination of virtual and in-person sessions), with synchronous (ie, a real-time approach),29 30 asynchronous (ie, no real-time interaction) format31 32 or a combination of synchronous and asynchronous activities (ie, participants completing some classes on their own) 33. Researchers have used a variety of technology platforms for exercise delivery, including bidirectional technology (eg, Zoom),29 30 or pre-recorded videos31 34 accessed by participants via email, phone31 34 or a website 32…”