2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ADHD desynchronizes brain activity during watching a distracted multi-talker conversation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the myriad potential ways to analyze data from naturalistic paradigms, we restricted our approach here to functional connectivity because it can be applied equally to both resting-state and movie-watching data, providing a straightforward way to test for differences between conditions. However, analyses that exploit the presence of a time-locked “ground truth” in naturalistic paradigms, such as inter-subject representational similarity analysis ( Finn et al, 2020 ), an extension of the inter-subject correlation family of approaches ( Hasson et al, 2004 ; Nastase et al, 2019 ), might prove even more sensitive to trait-level variability in both normative ( van Baar et al, 2019 ) and clinical populations ( Hasson et al, 2009 ; Salmi et al, 2013 ; Byrge et al, 2015 ; Bolton et al, 2018 ; Salmi et al, 2020 ). Because these and other activation-based approaches (e.g., Venkatesh et al, 2020 ) allow us to interpret spatiotemporal activity patterns in the context of stimulus features, they open the door to models that are not only predictive ( what are the relationships between brain function and behavior), but also deepen our understanding of how and why individuals show distinct brain responses to the same information, and how this relates to trait-level phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the myriad potential ways to analyze data from naturalistic paradigms, we restricted our approach here to functional connectivity because it can be applied equally to both resting-state and movie-watching data, providing a straightforward way to test for differences between conditions. However, analyses that exploit the presence of a time-locked “ground truth” in naturalistic paradigms, such as inter-subject representational similarity analysis ( Finn et al, 2020 ), an extension of the inter-subject correlation family of approaches ( Hasson et al, 2004 ; Nastase et al, 2019 ), might prove even more sensitive to trait-level variability in both normative ( van Baar et al, 2019 ) and clinical populations ( Hasson et al, 2009 ; Salmi et al, 2013 ; Byrge et al, 2015 ; Bolton et al, 2018 ; Salmi et al, 2020 ). Because these and other activation-based approaches (e.g., Venkatesh et al, 2020 ) allow us to interpret spatiotemporal activity patterns in the context of stimulus features, they open the door to models that are not only predictive ( what are the relationships between brain function and behavior), but also deepen our understanding of how and why individuals show distinct brain responses to the same information, and how this relates to trait-level phenotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, analyses that exploit the presence of a time-locked "ground truth" in naturalistic paradigms, such as inter-subject representational similarity analysis (Finn et al, 2020), an extension of the inter-subject correlation family of approaches (Hasson et al, 2004;Nastase et al, 2019), might prove even more sensitive to trait-level variability in both normative (van Baar et al, 2019) and clinical populations (Hasson et al, 2009;Salmi et al, 2013;Byrge et al, 2015;Bolton et al, 2018;Salmi et al, 2020). Because these and other activation-based approaches allow us to interpret spatiotemporal activity patterns in the context of stimulus features, they open the door to models that are not only predictive (what are the relationships between brain function and behavior), but also deepen our understanding of how and why individuals show distinct brain responses to the same information, and how this relates to trait-level phenotypes.…”
Section: Implications For Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of brain measures, inattention and hyperactivity have shown associations with gray matter volume in different areas of the brain in a population-based study ( Albaugh et al. 2017 ), and Salmi et al. (2020 ) found different dimensional associations between ISC and inattention and hyperactivity in their adult control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adults without attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive traits have been associated with interindividual synchrony of blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal during viewing of a naturalistic movie stimuli ( Salmi et al. 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation