2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ADHD and autistic traits, family function, parenting style, and social adjustment for Internet addiction among children and adolescents in Taiwan: A longitudinal study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
118
0
23

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
118
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Reason for exclusion Barnett et al [86] Participants are teachers Benyakorn et al [87] Not interventional Bishop [88] Intervention not technology Bonarini et al [89] Population focus not ADHD Bul et al [90] Outcome measures do not assess ADHD-related difficulties Chan et al [91] Not interventional Chen et al [92] Not interventional Christiansen et al [93] Intervention reliant on others Dale and Grut [94] Not exclusively for ADHD Duffy [95] Population focus not ADHD Enebrink et al [96] Population focus not ADHD References Reason for exclusion Epstein et al [97] Intervention reliant on health care professionals Fiellin et al [98] Population focus not ADHD Frutos-Pascual et al [99] Population focus not ADHD Frutos-Pascual and GarciaZapirain [100] Participants typically developing, not ADHD Gray et al [72] ADHD not primary diagnosis of participants Halperin et al [101] Intervention not technology Janeslätt et al [102] Intervention not technology Kim et al [103] Intervention not technology Lim et al [104] Intervention reliant on health care professionals Mazurek and Engelhardt [105] Not interventional Myers et al [106] Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Nie et al [107] Intervention not technology Pandria et al [108] Not interventional Rohani et al [109] Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Rosch and Mostofsky [110] Not interventional Schafer et al [111] Participants not received ADHD diagnosis Schuck et al [112] Participants not received ADHD diagnosis Shah et al 2012 Not interventional Silva et al [113] Technology as outcome measure, not intervention Steeger et al 2016 Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Stephenson [114] Population focus not ADHD Tse et al …”
Section: Appendix 2: References and Reasons For Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reason for exclusion Barnett et al [86] Participants are teachers Benyakorn et al [87] Not interventional Bishop [88] Intervention not technology Bonarini et al [89] Population focus not ADHD Bul et al [90] Outcome measures do not assess ADHD-related difficulties Chan et al [91] Not interventional Chen et al [92] Not interventional Christiansen et al [93] Intervention reliant on others Dale and Grut [94] Not exclusively for ADHD Duffy [95] Population focus not ADHD Enebrink et al [96] Population focus not ADHD References Reason for exclusion Epstein et al [97] Intervention reliant on health care professionals Fiellin et al [98] Population focus not ADHD Frutos-Pascual et al [99] Population focus not ADHD Frutos-Pascual and GarciaZapirain [100] Participants typically developing, not ADHD Gray et al [72] ADHD not primary diagnosis of participants Halperin et al [101] Intervention not technology Janeslätt et al [102] Intervention not technology Kim et al [103] Intervention not technology Lim et al [104] Intervention reliant on health care professionals Mazurek and Engelhardt [105] Not interventional Myers et al [106] Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Nie et al [107] Intervention not technology Pandria et al [108] Not interventional Rohani et al [109] Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Rosch and Mostofsky [110] Not interventional Schafer et al [111] Participants not received ADHD diagnosis Schuck et al [112] Participants not received ADHD diagnosis Shah et al 2012 Not interventional Silva et al [113] Technology as outcome measure, not intervention Steeger et al 2016 Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Stephenson [114] Population focus not ADHD Tse et al …”
Section: Appendix 2: References and Reasons For Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se entiende que existe una adicción conductual cuando la relación que la persona mantiene con ellas comienza a ser problemática (porque pasa excesivo tiempo realizándolas, porque deja de hacer otras cosas de más relevancia, porque el tiempo que no está realizándolas lo está deseando, etc.) (Alonso-Fernández, 2003;Echeburúa, 1999;Holden, 2001;Lemon, 2002 Internet en hombres (Chen et al, 2015;Choo et al, 2015;Durkee et al, 2016;Gentile et al, 2011;Haagsma et al, 2013;Hong, You, Kim y No, 2014;Kormas, Critselis, Janikian, Kafetzis y Tsitsika, 2011;Wang et al, 2011;Willoughby, 2008;Yu y Shek, 2013), en mujeres (Mihara et al, 2016;Durkee et al, 2012), o incluso aquellos en que no se sostienen diferencias atribuibles al sexo (Gámez-Guadix, 2014;Gámez-Guadix et al, 2015;Jackson et al, 2003 Rial et al (2015).…”
unclassified
“…Studies have shown that lack of social support, such as family support, challenges the formation of health behaviors (27,28). Family support was particularly important as suggested by previous studies, due to the fact that parents can serve as emotional support, supervise children's activities, and encourage healthy behaviors (29)(30)(31). A study found that student affairs administrators can play a crucial role in preventive programs for IA by identifying students with potential academic problems (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%