bUrinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infections in children. Urine culture remains the gold standard for diagnosis, but the utility of urine Gram stain relative to urinalysis (UA) is unclear. We reviewed 312 pediatric patients with suspected UTI who had urine culture, UA, and urine Gram stain performed from a single urine specimen. UA was considered positive if >10 leukocytes per oil immersion field were seen or if either nitrates or leukocyte esterase testing was positive. Urine Gram stain was considered positive if any organisms were seen. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated using urine culture as the gold standard. Thirty-seven (12%) patients had a culture-proven UTI. Compared to urine Gram stain, UA had equal sensitivity (97.3% versus 97.5%) and higher specificity (85% versus 74%). Empirical therapy was prescribed before the Gram stain result was known in 40 (49%) patients and after in 42 (51%) patients. The antibiotics chosen did not differ between the two groups (P ؍ 0.81), nor did they differ for patients with Gram-negative rods on urine Gram stain compared to those with Gram-positive cocci (P ؍ 0.67). From these data, we conclude that UA has excellent negative predictive value that is not enhanced by urine Gram stain and that antibiotic selection did not vary based on the urine Gram stain result. In conclusion, the clinical utility of urine Gram stain does not warrant the time or cost it requires. U rinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infections in children, accounting for up to 2% of pediatric hospital admissions at an annual cost of more than half a billion dollars (1). Timely diagnosis and antibiotic therapy are necessary to reduce the risk of serious complications from UTI (2). However, due to nonspecific manifestations, UTI requires a high degree of suspicion, which in turn has contributed to both underand overdiagnosis (3, 4). The need for timely antibiotic therapy necessitates the use of rapid diagnostic tests in addition to urine culture, notably, urinalysis (UA) and urine Gram stain. However, the utility of urine Gram stain relative to UA remains controversial. Previous studies have supported the use of urine Gram stain, urinalysis, or both as a screening test (5-8). However, the most recent American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines for the management of UTI in children 2 to 24 months of age does not include Gram stain as part of the diagnosis (9). Furthermore, significant resources are required to perform urine Gram stain in a timely manner, including microbiology technician time. The objectives of our study were to identify the sensitivity and specificity of UA and urine Gram stain and to determine whether urine Gram stain has utility in diagnosis or optimal antimicrobial prescribing for pediatric UTI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patient cohort.We retrospectively included all patients aged Յ19 years of age who had a urine culture, urinalysis, and urine Gram stain ordered on a single urine specimen between 28...