Abstract:Cells that undergo apoptosis in response to
innate immune inflammation during accumulation of virally infected cells at sites of infection and suggest that E1B 19K-deleted, replicating adenoviral vectors might induce greater inflammatory responses to virally infected cells than E1B 19K-positive vectors, because of the net effect of their loss-of-function mutation.
IMPORTANCE
We observed that cells dying a nonapoptotic cell death induced by adenovirus infection repressed macrophage proinflammatory responses whi… Show more
“…65 That is, apoptotic-like cells, dying as a result of infection with an E1B 19 K-deficient adenovirus, were not immunosuppressive, and non-apoptotic cells, dying as a result of wild-type adenoviral infection, were immunosuppressive. This 'reversed' behavior was attributable genetically to E1B 19 K. That authentic Bcl-2 could substitute for E1B 19 K, but that it does not program such a reversed behavior in the context of Figure 3 Glycosomal localization of glycolytic enzymes.…”
Section: Reprogrammed Cell Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 The complete genetic basis of adenoviral cell death reprogramming and its mechanism remain to be elucidated. Similarly, whether other viruses direct cell death reprogramming remains unexplored.…”
Innate immunity typically is responsible for initial host responses against infections. Independently, nucleated cells that die normally as part of the physiological process of homeostasis in mammals (including humans) suppress immunity. Specifically, the physiological process of cell death (apoptosis) generates cells that are recognized specifically by viable cells of all types and elicit a profound transient suppression of host immunity (termed 'innate apoptotic immunity' (IAI)). IAI appears to be important normally for the maintenance of self-tolerance and for the resolution of inflammation. In addition, pathogens are able to take advantage of IAI through a variety of distinct mechanisms, to enable their proliferation within the host and enhance pathogenicity. For example, the protist pathogen Leishmania amazonensis, at its infective stage, mimics apoptotic cells by expressing apoptotic-like protein determinants on the cell surface, triggering immunosuppression directly. In contrast, the pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes triggers cell death in host lymphocytes, relying on those apoptotic cells to suppress host immune control and facilitate bacterial expansion. Finally, although the inhibition of apoptotic cell death is a common attribute of many viruses which facilitates their extended replication, it is clear that adenoviruses also reprogram the non-apoptotic dead cells that arise subsequently to manifest apoptotic-like immunosuppressive properties. These three instances represent diverse strategies used by microbial pathogens to exploit IAI, focusing attention on the potency of this facet of host immune control. Further examination of these cases will be revealing both of varied mechanisms of pathogenesis and the processes involved in IAI control.
“…65 That is, apoptotic-like cells, dying as a result of infection with an E1B 19 K-deficient adenovirus, were not immunosuppressive, and non-apoptotic cells, dying as a result of wild-type adenoviral infection, were immunosuppressive. This 'reversed' behavior was attributable genetically to E1B 19 K. That authentic Bcl-2 could substitute for E1B 19 K, but that it does not program such a reversed behavior in the context of Figure 3 Glycosomal localization of glycolytic enzymes.…”
Section: Reprogrammed Cell Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 The complete genetic basis of adenoviral cell death reprogramming and its mechanism remain to be elucidated. Similarly, whether other viruses direct cell death reprogramming remains unexplored.…”
Innate immunity typically is responsible for initial host responses against infections. Independently, nucleated cells that die normally as part of the physiological process of homeostasis in mammals (including humans) suppress immunity. Specifically, the physiological process of cell death (apoptosis) generates cells that are recognized specifically by viable cells of all types and elicit a profound transient suppression of host immunity (termed 'innate apoptotic immunity' (IAI)). IAI appears to be important normally for the maintenance of self-tolerance and for the resolution of inflammation. In addition, pathogens are able to take advantage of IAI through a variety of distinct mechanisms, to enable their proliferation within the host and enhance pathogenicity. For example, the protist pathogen Leishmania amazonensis, at its infective stage, mimics apoptotic cells by expressing apoptotic-like protein determinants on the cell surface, triggering immunosuppression directly. In contrast, the pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes triggers cell death in host lymphocytes, relying on those apoptotic cells to suppress host immune control and facilitate bacterial expansion. Finally, although the inhibition of apoptotic cell death is a common attribute of many viruses which facilitates their extended replication, it is clear that adenoviruses also reprogram the non-apoptotic dead cells that arise subsequently to manifest apoptotic-like immunosuppressive properties. These three instances represent diverse strategies used by microbial pathogens to exploit IAI, focusing attention on the potency of this facet of host immune control. Further examination of these cases will be revealing both of varied mechanisms of pathogenesis and the processes involved in IAI control.
“…We reported that Ad5 E1B 19K function is required for Ad-infected, dying cells (CPE corpses) to repress stimulus-induced, NF-B-dependent transcription and related cytokine production by responder macrophages, an E1B 19K function termed apoptotic mimicry (7). As observed with wt Ad5 infection, wt Ad14-infected human A549 (lung epithelial cell) CPE corpses repressed PMA-induced NF-B-dependent transcription in reporter cells, whereas CPE corpses infected with either Ad14p1 clinical isolate failed to repress this response, in a pattern similar to that of infection with the 19K-deleted Ad mutant, H5 dl337 (Fig.…”
Section: Ad14p1 Isolates Exhibit Large-plaque and Cytocidal Phenotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously reported that cells dying as a result of wt Ad5 infection repress the host inflammatory response to the virus (7). Expression of the Ad E1B 19-kilodalton (19K) protein is required for this anti-inflammatory activity since cells infected with an Ad mutant that lacks expression of 19K fail to exhibit anti-inflammatory activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We postulated that emergent Ad strains that induce ARDS might either lack sufficient expression of 19/20K or express a mutated 19/20K, resulting in an enhanced host proinflammatory response to Ad infection. Adenoviruses that express either reduced levels or a mutant form of 19/20K have a large-plaque (lp) phenotype and increased cytopathic effect (CPE) in cell culture (the so-called cyt phenotype) and generate CPE corpses that either fail to repress or induce increased proinflammatory responses of activated macrophages (7).…”
Adenovirus 14p1 (Ad14p1) is an emergent variant of Ad serotype 14 (Ad14) that has caused increased severity of respiratory illnesses during globally distributed outbreaks, including cases of acute respiratory distress syndrome and death. We found that human cell infection with Ad14p1 results in markedly decreased expression of the E1B 20-kilodalton (20K) protein compared to that with infection with wild-type (wt) Ad14. This reduced Ad14p1 E1B 20K expression caused a loss-of-function phenotype of Ad-infected cell corpses that, in contrast to cells infected with wt Ad14, either failed to repress or increased NF-B-dependent, proinflammatory cytokine responses of responder human alveolar macrophages. A small-animal model of Ad14-induced lung infection was used to test the translational relevance of these in vitro observations. Intratracheal infection of Syrian hamsters with Ad14p1 caused a marked, patchy bronchopneumonia, whereas hamster infection with wt Ad14 caused minimal peribronchial inflammation. These results suggest that this difference in E1B 20K gene expression during Ad14p1 infection and its modulating effect on the interactions between Ad14-infected cells and the host innate immune response could explain the increased immunopathogenic potential and associated increase in clinical illness in some people infected with the Ad14p1 outbreak strain.
IMPORTANCE
We previously reported that Ad-infected human cells exhibit E1B 19K-dependent repression of virally induced, NF-B-depen-
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.