2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adenoviral Transduction of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: In Vitro Responses and In Vivo Immune Responses after Cell Transplantation

Abstract: Adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are non-hematopoietic cells with multi-lineage potential which makes them attractive targets for regenerative medicine applications. However, to date, therapeutic success of MSC-therapy is limited and the genetic modification of MSCs using viral vectors is one option to improve their therapeutic potential. Ex-vivo genetic modification of MSCs using recombinant adenovirus (Ad) could be promising to reduce undesired immune responses as Ad will be removed before cell/tissue tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are different from previously published reports that genetic modification of MSCs did not affect their differentiation potential [37], [38] and requires consideration of the effect of accumulated paracrine factors on the differentiation of genetically modified hBMSCs. Tracy et al have also shown that adenovirus transduction of BMSCs did not adversely affect their immunological properties as well as expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors [39]. However, they did not determine the effect of genetic modification on stemness as measured by expression of Nanog and Oct4 genes which are the key transcription factors for maintaining pluripotency and self-renewal potential of undifferentiated embryonic stem cells [40], [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are different from previously published reports that genetic modification of MSCs did not affect their differentiation potential [37], [38] and requires consideration of the effect of accumulated paracrine factors on the differentiation of genetically modified hBMSCs. Tracy et al have also shown that adenovirus transduction of BMSCs did not adversely affect their immunological properties as well as expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors [39]. However, they did not determine the effect of genetic modification on stemness as measured by expression of Nanog and Oct4 genes which are the key transcription factors for maintaining pluripotency and self-renewal potential of undifferentiated embryonic stem cells [40], [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While retrovirus and lentivirus vectors integrate their genetic material into the host cell genome [135], recombinant adenoviruses would not raise such safety concern; nevertheless, their direct systemic use can trigger potent immune responses against their own proteins instead [72,136]. Interestingly, Treacy et al [137] showed that adenoviral transduction of MSCs did not induce immune responses in vitro or after a single application in vivo. Furthermore, the expression levels of markers related to immune responses were not greatly modified when compared to using naïve cells.…”
Section: Biosafety: New Scenes and Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemokines are further subdivided into C, CC, CX3C and CXC subgroups according to the position of conserved cysteine motifs in their structure [14]. CXCL10 (interferon-γ-inducible protein 10, previously called IP-10) was initially discovered as a chemokine which is induced by interferon (IFN)-γ and is produced by a wide range of cell types including monocytes [15], neutrophils [16], endothelial cells [17], keratinocytes [18], fibroblasts [19], mesenchymal cells [20], dendritic cells [21], hepatocytes [22] and astrocytes [23]. CXCL10 binds to CXCR3, which is discussed in the next section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%