2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adenosine-sensitive atrial tachycardia originating from the proximal coronary sinus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For that reason, it is important to consider how close to the AV node we can discriminate AT by the delta‐VA interval. Adenosine‐sensitive reentrant AT originating from near Koch's triangle is one of the most difficult entities to distinguish from AVNRT, and it is believed that the transitional cells near the AV node are included in the AT circuit 1,5 . The circuit of the AT is generally in the proximity of the AV node; however, six cases of adenosine‐sensitive reentrant AT arising from near Koch's triangle in the present study had a delta‐VA interval of 52 ± 14 ms (range, 33–76 ms), and successful ablation was achieved without any influence on the AV conduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For that reason, it is important to consider how close to the AV node we can discriminate AT by the delta‐VA interval. Adenosine‐sensitive reentrant AT originating from near Koch's triangle is one of the most difficult entities to distinguish from AVNRT, and it is believed that the transitional cells near the AV node are included in the AT circuit 1,5 . The circuit of the AT is generally in the proximity of the AV node; however, six cases of adenosine‐sensitive reentrant AT arising from near Koch's triangle in the present study had a delta‐VA interval of 52 ± 14 ms (range, 33–76 ms), and successful ablation was achieved without any influence on the AV conduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…A diagnosis of each tachycardia was made based on the standard criteria 1–13 and the results of the radiofrequency ablation. AVNRT was considered typical when the septal VA interval was ≤70 ms and atypical if >70 ms. ORT was diagnosed if the VA conduction interval increased by greater than 20 ms with the development of bundle‐branch block or if ventricular extrastimuli during the tachycardia applied when the His bundle was refractory resulted in tachycardia termination or resetting without alteration in the atrial activation sequence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although fractionated electrograms occupying a large percentage of tachycardia cycle length were not observed in their cases, a single extrastimulus delivered from the slow pathway region, distant from the EAAS, reset the AT with a postpacing interval identical to the AT cycle length. 16 Furthermore, radiofrequency energy application to this extrastimulation site terminated AT, suggesting that the slow pathway region is part of the reentrant circuit of adenosine-sensitive focal AT originating from the proximal coronary sinus. Thus, adeno- sine sensitivity is consistent with either calcium channeldependent microreentry or c-AMP-dependent triggered activity, as suggested by Iwai at al.…”
Section: Mechanism Of At and Its Substratementioning
confidence: 91%
“…[1][2][3][4]8 Regarding the sensitivity of adenosine and the mechanism of focal AT, Markowitz et al 15 proposed that adenosine sensitive focal AT is commonly due to triggered activity or automaticity; however, their adenosine-insensitive focal reentrant ATs showed low-amplitude, fractionated electrograms at the site of origin, which occupy a large percent of tachycardia cycle length, 15 different from the ATs presented in this study or those reported previously. [1][2][3][4]8 In addition, Horie et al 16 reported 7 cases of adenosine-sensitive focal reentrant ATs originating from the proximal coronary sinus. Although fractionated electrograms occupying a large percentage of tachycardia cycle length were not observed in their cases, a single extrastimulus delivered from the slow pathway region, distant from the EAAS, reset the AT with a postpacing interval identical to the AT cycle length.…”
Section: Mechanism Of At and Its Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous reports demonstrated that an RF energy delivery to the earliest atrial activation site could terminate the ATP‐AT without impairing the AV nodal conduction even though the ablation was applied within close vicinity of the His recording site . Ouyang et al, Ueyama et al, and Weber et al, reported that ATP‐ATs were successfully ablated in the noncoronary aortic cusp without inducing any injurious effects on the AV node.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%