2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(00)00033-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adenosine: does it have a neuroprotective role after all?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
188
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 221 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 170 publications
5
188
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data are representative of three independent experiments. and inflammation (Cunha, 2001;de Mendonca et al, 2000). Since ROS damages neurons directly or indirectly through the activation of inflammation (Whittemore et al, 1994;Qin et al, 2004), suppression of intracellular ROS may be an effective way to protect neurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data are representative of three independent experiments. and inflammation (Cunha, 2001;de Mendonca et al, 2000). Since ROS damages neurons directly or indirectly through the activation of inflammation (Whittemore et al, 1994;Qin et al, 2004), suppression of intracellular ROS may be an effective way to protect neurons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And, in fact, a diversity of studies in different brain preparations of different species using different noxious stimuli, consistently found that the acute activation of inhibitory A 1 Rs is neuroprotective (elegantly reviewed in [171]). Thus, in isolated neurons and in brain slices, A 1 R activation reduces damage to neurons, whereas A 1 R antagonists potentiate damage (reviewed in [171Y174]).…”
Section: Modification Of Adenosine Metabolism On Stressful Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first major drawback is due to the profound cardiovascular effects of A 1 R agonists (e.g., [178,179]), which are most worrying because A 1 R agonists have a poor brain permeability [180,181]. The second limitation is related to the short Fwindow of opportunity_ of A 1 R agonists, which is limited to a few hours, at most, after the initiation of the brain insult (reviewed in [171,173,174]; but see [182]). This is aggravated by the fact that is not conceivable to administer A 1 R agonists chronically (as a preventive strategy) because it causes an effect inversion, i.e.…”
Section: Modification Of Adenosine Metabolism On Stressful Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Altogether, these physiological functions of adenosine operated through A 1 receptors provide a compelling rationale for this modulation system to fulfil a neuroprotective role in situations of brain damage (reviewed in de Mendonça et al, 2000). Interestingly, although the activation of A 1 receptors prevents or attenuates neuronal damage (de Mendonça et al, 2000), evidence is accumulating to suggest that the neuroprotection afforded by activation of A 1 receptors might be unrelated to its synaptic www.elsevier.com/locate/neuint Neurochemistry International 52 (2008) [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72] effects and probably results from its extra-synaptic effects, in particular the decrease brain metabolism (Håberg et al, 2000;Duarte et al, 2005) and eventually the control of glia cells (reviewed in van Calker and Biber, 2005).…”
Section: Adenosine In the Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%