1987
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19871101)60:9<2304::aid-cncr2820600931>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adenocarcinoma arising in a colonic interposition following resection of squamous cell esophageal cancer

Abstract: This article documents the first case of adenocarcinoma arising in a colonic interposition that was performed after resection of squamous cell esophageal cancer. In long-term survivors of esophageal cancer surgery, this unusual complication must be considered as a cause of recurrent dysphagia or other symptoms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This case serves as a reminder of the importance of colon interposition screening. Furthermore, in the review of literature (Table 1) [14,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]], 15 out of 22 patients have developed adenocarcinoma in the grafted interposed colon. This could have been prevented if the patients had regular EGD screening or surveillance follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case serves as a reminder of the importance of colon interposition screening. Furthermore, in the review of literature (Table 1) [14,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]], 15 out of 22 patients have developed adenocarcinoma in the grafted interposed colon. This could have been prevented if the patients had regular EGD screening or surveillance follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barium esophagography has the advantage of providing functional evaluation of the graft and integrity of the conduit anastomosis. However, radiographic evaluations and interpretations of the interposed colon may be difficult if there is unfamiliarity with the various surgical procedures and the postoperative appearances [10, 11]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge only four cases have been reported previously (Table I). In both cases where the patients died from disseminated tumour there was some delay in the diagnosis as initial contrast studies of the grafts failed to demonstrate the tumours and the diagnosis was only established later when endoscopies were performed (Licata et al, 1978;Haerr et al, 1987). In the other two cases the tumours were successfully resected and further reconstructions were achieved with gastric interposition (Houghton et al, 1989) and the creation of a new cologastrostomy (Goldsmith and Beattie, 1968).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The late development of dysphagia in a patient with a colonic interposition graft should always be taken seriously and thoroughly investigated. Contrast studies of colonic grafts can be difficult to interpret due to altered anatomy (Licata et al, 1978;Haerr et al, 1987). Endoscopy and biopsy should therefore be considered early.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%