2019
DOI: 10.1111/jnc.14670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adeno‐associated virus‐mediated over‐expression of CREB‐regulated transcription coactivator 1 in the hippocampal dentate gyrus ameliorates lipopolysaccharide‐induced depression‐like behaviour in mice

Abstract: Depression is a highly complex global disabling psychiatric disorder. Unfortunately, the currently available antidepressants are not effective in a significant percentage of patients. Therefore, the underlying mechanisms of depression must be explored at the molecular level to discover new candidate molecular targets for depression treatment. Behavioural and molecular depression‐like endophenotypes have been observed in cyclic AMP response element‐binding protein‐regulated transcription coactivator 1 (Crtc1) k… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ni et al . () extend the findings of Breuillaud et al . () and significantly advance the field with their recent study published in this issue of Journal of Neurochemistry .…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ni et al . () extend the findings of Breuillaud et al . () and significantly advance the field with their recent study published in this issue of Journal of Neurochemistry .…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The present report by Ni et al . () further shows that VGF in the hippocampus is also decreased consequent to CRTC1 knockdown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We demonstrate that adult murine NPCs and immature neurons up to approximately 1 week of age are eliminated by rAAV in a dose-dependent fashion (Figure 1). The doses demonstrated to ablate neurogenesis are within or below the range of experimentally relevant titers commonly injected into the mouse DG, 1.5 E12 to 3.6 E13 gc/mL (Anacker et al, 2018;Castle et al, 2018;Danielson et al, 2016Danielson et al, , 2017Gong and Zhou, 2018;Hashimotodani et al, 2017;Hayashi et al, 2017;Kaspar et al, 2002;Kirschen et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2012;McAvoy et al, 2016;Ni et al, 2019;Pilz et al, 2016;Ramirez et al, 2015;Raza et al, 2017;Redondo et al, 2014;Senzai and Buzsáki, 2017;Swiech et al, 2015;Zetsche et al, 2017). This rAAVinduced cell death is rapid and persistent; BrdU-labeled cells and Tbr2+ intermediate progenitors begin to die within 12 to 18 hours post-injection and are eliminated by 48 hours (Figure 2).…”
Section: A Developmental Window For Sensitivity To Raav-induced Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1). The doses demonstrated to ablate neurogenesis are within or below the range of experimentally relevant titers commonly injected into the mouse DG, 1.5 E12 to 3.6 E13 gc/mL (Anacker et al, 2018;Castle et al, 2018;Danielson et al, 2016Danielson et al, , 2017Gong and Zhou, 2018;Hashimotodani et al, 2017;Hayashi et al, 2017;Kaspar et al, 2002;Kirschen et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2012;McAvoy et al, 2016;Ni et al, 2019;Pilz et al, 2016;Ramirez et al, 2013;Raza et al, 2017;Redondo et al, 2014;Senzai and Buzsáki, 2017;Swiech et al, 2015;Zetsche et al, 2017). This rAAV-induced cell death is rapid and persistent; BrdU-labeled cells and Tbr2+ intermediate progenitors begin to die within 12 to 18 hours post-injection and are eliminated by 48 hours (Fig.…”
Section: A Developmental Window For Sensitivity To Raav-induced Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Both theoretical and experimental studies indicate that the DG is involved in hippocampusdependent behavioral pattern separation and pattern completion (Chawla et al, 2005;Deng et al, 2013;Lacy et al, 2011;Leutgeb et al, 2007;Marr, 1971;McClelland et al, 1995;Treves and Rolls, 1994;Yassa and Stark, 2011). More recent studies implementing genetically encoded tools, often delivered via rAAV, provide striking evidence for the role of memory engram representations in behavioral pattern separation and completion in the DG (Bernier et al, 2017;Danielson et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2012;Ramirez et al, 2013;Redondo et al, 2014) and highlight the role of this circuit in affective disorders and stress responses (Anacker et al, 2018;Li et al, 2017;Ni et al, 2019;Ramirez et al, 2015;Shuto et al, 2018;. Moreover, DG activity and computations appear to depend on the addition of abDGCs (Clelland et al, 2009;Ikrar et al, 2013;Sahay et al, 2011a), which attenuate the activity of mature DGCs.…”
Section: Implications For Dg and Hippocampal Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%